"We decided we wanted to play 'the Norwich way'"
Well, as per ricardo's report, there we have it. And deciding to play 'the Norwich way' meant, of course, we had to have someone who UNDERSTANDS THE CLUB (as though managing Norwich City is somehow alien to anyone who didn't play here for years first) and someone who BLEEDS GREEN AND YELLOW. Because, as any fule no, the reason we got relegated in 2009 wasn't because Roeder was s**t, or Gunn was s**t, or the club had been mismanaged from the top for years. It was because - as per Roger Munby - Roeder and Grant didn't 'bleed green and yellow'.
That is the thought process of these muppets. That's all it amounts to. Never mind that:
1. If you have a team which plays cautiously and negatively, and whose players aren't suited to glorious expansive football, you can't change the way that team plays overnight;
2. If you're going to try to do that, you'd better make damn sure you've got a proven manager who the players respect and are inspired by and who has had real success playing that kind of football already: a kind of football which is the hardest of any to perfect and succeed with;
3. Playing that way rarely if ever works in this pig of a league. What does work? Bottle, belief, balls, attitude: none of which have ever been Norwich City's forte, with the occasional exception under Saunders or Lambert.
You know why they've brought Phelan in now? Really why? Because if they have to get rid of Adams - and no club with even half a clue would've appointed him in the first place - they have to have someone else who 'understands the club' and 'bleeds green and yellow'. Never mind that Phelan has no managerial experience whatsoever; never mind that no club appointed him as manager after Fergie retired.
It's a joke. There's no analysis at this club; no proper football thinking at all. It's cross your fingers, hope for the best, and learn absolutely nothing. Still: at least they've managed something. Because playing 'the Norwich way' has achieved awfully close to the square root of f**k all throughout our history. And under this shower, that's what we'll be doing again this season too.
Posted By: thebigfeller on November 26th 2014 at 02:41:32
Message Thread
- "We decided we wanted to play 'the Norwich way'" (NCFC) - thebigfeller, Nov 26, 02:41:32
- "The Norwich Way" = soft touch. Bollocks to that. (NCFC) - CROYDONCANARY, Nov 26, 12:05:43
- blub (n/m) (NCFC) - Charles21, Nov 26, 10:50:34
- To be honest if that means developing a consistent playing style over time in the way (NCFC) - Jim, Nov 26, 08:20:45
- We are a joke but Adams position... (NCFC) - loz, Nov 26, 08:32:50
- I hope so. The line I cling to is "and at the first opportunity means this season." (n/m) (NCFC) - Jim, Nov 26, 08:35:22
- We are a joke but Adams position... (NCFC) - loz, Nov 26, 08:32:50
- "Playing the Norwich way" was defined in the presentation as (NCFC) - Mozzer, Nov 26, 07:30:58
- For once that's quite an enjoyable, funny and self-effacing post (NCFC) - norway, Nov 26, 07:27:41
- * trolling * (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Nov 26, 09:48:06
- Didn't we play "the Norwich way" under Stringer and Walker (NCFC) - lurd, Nov 26, 07:23:18
- Maybe 20 years ago there was a norwich way but it doesn't exist now (NCFC) - Mickdundee, Nov 26, 14:08:55
- Facts getting in the way of a good blub......... (n/m) (NCFC) - usacanary, Nov 26, 12:01:14
- That's spot on (NCFC) - Mickdundee, Nov 26, 07:09:02
- I couldn't give a shit about the norwich way (NCFC) - Mickdundee, Nov 26, 07:22:35
- The Norwich Way (tm) is just something they say to please supporters. (NCFC) - APB, Nov 26, 07:29:29
- But it's the reason spouted from the board for adams (n/m) (NCFC) - Mickdundee, Nov 26, 14:10:22
- You say that but Hughton's acheivement of finishing 10th gets pulled apart all the time. (NCFC) - lurd, Nov 26, 07:27:43
- Not by me I've said plenty times that was a good achievement (n/m) (NCFC) - Mickdundee, Nov 26, 13:07:30
- The Norwich Way (tm) is just something they say to please supporters. (NCFC) - APB, Nov 26, 07:29:29
- I couldn't give a shit about the norwich way (NCFC) - Mickdundee, Nov 26, 07:22:35
- I don't necessarily disagree or agree totally with what you say. (NCFC) - APB, Nov 26, 06:54:41
- Which is entirely why they need rational, dispassionate professionals who know their (NCFC) - thebigfeller, Nov 26, 07:08:25
- plenty of CEOs stay in post successfully 5+ years (NCFC) - CWC, Nov 26, 08:34:36
- The first two things you say are conjecture. (NCFC) - APB, Nov 26, 07:27:04
- Which is entirely why they need rational, dispassionate professionals who know their (NCFC) - thebigfeller, Nov 26, 07:08:25
- This is going to skew the stats. Posting other than when Nodge have lost. (n/m) (NCFC) - Arizona Bay, Nov 26, 06:54:06
- Oh well. (NCFC) - Garry Brooke, Nov 26, 06:48:38
- I'm with you avenging canary (NCFC) - trianglepatch, Nov 26, 06:38:53
- Why are you "sure the board will sort it"? In 20 yrs, they've only got one decision right (NCFC) - thebigfeller, Nov 26, 07:16:00
- "those who get it wrong - again and again and again" (NCFC) - APB, Nov 26, 07:31:59
- Oh, so I'm not allowed to criticise other posters then? I see. (NCFC) - thebigfeller, Nov 26, 16:44:59
- He sounds like an anally retentive Farage. (n/m) (NCFC) - Garry Brooke, Nov 26, 07:42:16
- "those who get it wrong - again and again and again" (NCFC) - APB, Nov 26, 07:31:59
- He doesn't support the team though. (NCFC) - lurd, Nov 26, 07:15:04
- Well said trianglepatch, that's pretty much what I wanted to say. (n/m) (NCFC) - Bravo win or die, Nov 26, 07:05:13
- Why are you "sure the board will sort it"? In 20 yrs, they've only got one decision right (NCFC) - thebigfeller, Nov 26, 07:16:00
- You could support one of your other teams? (NCFC) - avenging canary, Nov 26, 04:45:59
- You could respond to what I wrote. Engage with it, discuss it, disagree with it (NCFC) - thebigfeller, Nov 26, 04:48:04
- I'm tired of reading your posts as I've said before. (NCFC) - avenging canary, Nov 26, 04:52:34
- I'm really offended now. (NCFC) - thebigfeller, Nov 26, 04:55:56
- I'm tired of reading your posts as I've said before. (NCFC) - avenging canary, Nov 26, 04:52:34
- You could respond to what I wrote. Engage with it, discuss it, disagree with it (NCFC) - thebigfeller, Nov 26, 04:48:04
- A lot of folks on here will disagree with you or find you (NCFC) - SeattleSounders, Nov 26, 04:26:12
- That sums it up quite nicely. (n/m) (NCFC) - bobble, Nov 26, 04:02:07
- Quite amazing how clueless our board are (NCFC) - SCC 28, Nov 26, 03:00:41
- Quite amazing how clueless our board are (NCFC) - SCC 28, Nov 26, 03:00:06
- Lambert a complete fluke??? McNally sacked Gunn and sought of Paul Lambert (NCFC) - Mozzer, Nov 26, 07:35:17
- I agree with you it wasn't a fluke but what it also shows (NCFC) - Jim, Nov 26, 08:29:30
- You must surely know by now that any successes are pure flukes and everything else is (NCFC) - lurd, Nov 26, 08:12:51
- becuase it suits the agenda.... which you make fit around the real story...... (n/m) (NCFC) - usacanary, Nov 26, 12:02:49
- Lambert a complete fluke??? McNally sacked Gunn and sought of Paul Lambert (NCFC) - Mozzer, Nov 26, 07:35:17
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.