I will try and explain
Let's leave it down here because I don't want to bring it to the top and start a whole new thread. But let me explain why you are a troll and how you have been trolling.
For well over a year there has been a reasonable and considered debate about Hughton, the club and our medium term prospects. Many supporters and posters have expressed their frustration and their desire for a fresh start. You have taken the opposite view.
However in taking the opposite view, you have chosen to pepper every other post on the topic with base insults of anyone who holds the 'out' position. It's never been enough for you to simply debate. Opponents of Hughton have to be mongs, idiots, c**ts and mentally ill. "Stop losing your s**t, this is the time of our lives, we're living the dream" etc etc - provocative, inflexible, aggressive posting that always - absolutely always made it abundantly clear: there is no room for debate or discussion - anyone who wants Hughton out is a f**king idiot.
And of course, by pointing out the unreasonableness, the sheeraggressive bloodymindedness of your unpleasant approach, posters are labelled scum, dogs, bullies and (yesterday) mentally ill.
So are you trolling for changing your mind? Of course not. Do I believe that you thought Hughton was the right man for the job? Of course. But there are ways of doing it; ways of behaving, ways of conducting yourself.
Your way has been to abuse, insult and dismis without even entertainig the thought of considering shades of grey in your black and white world where every day is an opportunity to put those with different views down.
The vein of nastiness that runs through your posting is what irritates me beyond beliefe and what encourages me to bite back at you. you absolutely deserve it and the absolute vicious nastiness you expressed last night only proves the point.
Just be a better poster, stop attacking and insulting those who disagree with you and everyone can be friends. It's really that simple. Can you manage it? Probably not - but it needs to be said whether you're prepated to hear it or not.
Posted By: norway on January 15th 2014 at 07:56:08
Message Thread
- Don't understand this anti-Malky stuff at all. I think it's mad actually (NCFC) - thebigfeller, Jan 15, 00:51:10
- I'd back him but be very very disappointed. I want progression, hope not hoofball and his (NCFC) - BINMEN8R, Jan 15, 06:51:29
- People don't like Hughton due to his style (NCFC) - Darren Eadie, Jan 15, 00:56:14
- So the reason folk don't want him is ONE GAME, in which Cardiff were the underdogs, (NCFC) - thebigfeller, Jan 15, 01:28:05
- If you think he out thought his opponent in that game (NCFC) - Darren Eadie, Jan 15, 08:41:03
- Out thought his opposite number? Are you serious? We absolutely battered them. The most (NCFC) - BINMEN8R, Jan 15, 06:55:13
- We out thought them, Fer scored remember (NCFC) - pants, Jan 15, 02:18:03
- :) (n/m) (NCFC) - thebigfeller, Jan 15, 02:32:53
- I genuinely shocked how tonight changed me. A few idiots on here have decided (NCFC) - pants, Jan 15, 02:43:43
- I will try and explain (NCFC) - norway, Jan 15, 07:56:08
- you are scum. im not reading another word of your illness (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Jan 15, 10:07:30
- Yep, pretty much as I expected. (n/m) (NCFC) - norway, Jan 15, 10:18:49
- you are scum. im not reading another word of your illness (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Jan 15, 10:07:30
- I kind of feel the same way, (NCFC) - I Am Hoot, Jan 15, 04:27:23
- I will try and explain (NCFC) - norway, Jan 15, 07:56:08
- I genuinely shocked how tonight changed me. A few idiots on here have decided (NCFC) - pants, Jan 15, 02:43:43
- :) (n/m) (NCFC) - thebigfeller, Jan 15, 02:32:53
- No, he's always had the perception on here of being negative and hoofing (n/m) (NCFC) - Yellalee, Jan 15, 01:45:50
- Cardiff are freshly promoted (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 15, 00:58:19
- When we were freshly promoted under lambert (NCFC) - Darren Eadie, Jan 15, 01:00:11
- We had bad games (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 15, 01:09:56
- I wouldn't say he won the tactical battle after we created 30+ opportunities (NCFC) - Darren Eadie, Jan 15, 01:14:57
- Mostly long range efforts (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 15, 01:17:54
- Hughton couldn't react to the wind changing (n/m) (NCFC) - Darren Eadie, Jan 15, 01:18:46
- Which is precisely why he has to go (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 15, 01:20:46
- I agree (NCFC) - Darren Eadie, Jan 15, 01:21:35
- Which is precisely why he has to go (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 15, 01:20:46
- Hughton couldn't react to the wind changing (n/m) (NCFC) - Darren Eadie, Jan 15, 01:18:46
- Mostly long range efforts (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 15, 01:17:54
- I wouldn't say he won the tactical battle after we created 30+ opportunities (NCFC) - Darren Eadie, Jan 15, 01:14:57
- We had bad games (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 15, 01:09:56
- Thanks for that (NCFC) - Darren Eadie, Jan 15, 00:59:13
- Thought that was probably the case (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 15, 01:07:17
- When we were freshly promoted under lambert (NCFC) - Darren Eadie, Jan 15, 01:00:11
- So the reason folk don't want him is ONE GAME, in which Cardiff were the underdogs, (NCFC) - thebigfeller, Jan 15, 01:28:05
- Great post (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 15, 00:54:41
- Hoofball (n/m) (NCFC) - wolfio, Jan 15, 00:53:41
- Correct (n/m) (NCFC) - Darren Eadie, Jan 15, 00:54:16
- Do you think there are already too many people against him? (n/m) (NCFC) - Hulk Rules, Jan 15, 00:52:17
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.