I thought and so did one of the pink ian podcasters, that it was the wrong game to go 2 up

top.

Surrendered the midfield to them and without Wes we had nobody who wanted to keep the ball.

That's why they had so much of the game, when Wes did come on he was out wide left and had less influence than he would have centrally.

I wonder if the outside pressure to go 442 has told.

Posted By: jafski on March 11th 2013 at 09:34:42

Message Thread

Southampton Game relections (NCFC) - Claygate_Canary, Mar 11, 09:11:33
- I thought and so did one of the pink ian podcasters, that it was the wrong game to go 2 up (NCFC) - jafski, Mar 11, 09:34:42
  - ^^^VMT^^^ stupid decision. (n/m) (NCFC) - BINMEN8R, Mar 11, 10:44:26
  - "without Wes" (NCFC) - mr carra, Mar 11, 10:09:40
    - "when Wes did come on he was out wide left and had less influence than he would have (NCFC) - jafski, Mar 11, 10:21:14
      - except in practice he wasn't out left very much (NCFC) - mr carra, Mar 11, 10:24:22
        
        Still was wide left in a 442, not central in a 451, or 4411, however you want to slice it. (NCFC) - jafski, Mar 11, 10:27:48
- Only just watched MotD, Saints adapted to the conditions better than us, could have ended (NCFC) - BSE Canary, Mar 11, 09:27:56
  - I think Tettey's absence has really hit us (NCFC) - Old Man, Mar 11, 09:30:58

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.