I think Tettey's absence has really hit us
We don't have anyone else who can do that job as well. I do think Fox is unlucky not to have had a go and maybe he'll start soon, but really we need Tettey back soon as.
Posted By: Old Man on March 11th 2013 at 09:30:58
Message Thread
- Southampton Game relections (NCFC) - Claygate_Canary, Mar 11, 09:11:33
- I thought and so did one of the pink ian podcasters, that it was the wrong game to go 2 up (NCFC) - jafski, Mar 11, 09:34:42
- ^^^VMT^^^ stupid decision. (n/m) (NCFC) - BINMEN8R, Mar 11, 10:44:26
- "without Wes" (NCFC) - mr carra, Mar 11, 10:09:40
- "when Wes did come on he was out wide left and had less influence than he would have (NCFC) - jafski, Mar 11, 10:21:14
- except in practice he wasn't out left very much (NCFC) - mr carra, Mar 11, 10:24:22
- Still was wide left in a 442, not central in a 451, or 4411, however you want to slice it. (NCFC) - jafski, Mar 11, 10:27:48
- except in practice he wasn't out left very much (NCFC) - mr carra, Mar 11, 10:24:22
- "when Wes did come on he was out wide left and had less influence than he would have (NCFC) - jafski, Mar 11, 10:21:14
- Only just watched MotD, Saints adapted to the conditions better than us, could have ended (NCFC) - BSE Canary, Mar 11, 09:27:56
- I think Tettey's absence has really hit us (NCFC) - Old Man, Mar 11, 09:30:58
- I thought and so did one of the pink ian podcasters, that it was the wrong game to go 2 up (NCFC) - jafski, Mar 11, 09:34:42
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.