Nursey says LMA backing Lambert and
We are heading for a Premier League tribunal over compensation
Posted By: loz on June 9th 2012 at 10:52:00
Message Thread
- Nursey says LMA backing Lambert and (NCFC) - loz, Jun 9, 10:52:00
- Course they will back Lambert he's their member (NCFC) - Jim, Jun 9, 12:25:13
- The LMA is the managers' union (NCFC) - King, Jun 9, 12:34:54
- And they are going to back lambert over us (n/m) (NCFC) - Jim, Jun 9, 12:36:13
- Of course they are, they're a union (NCFC) - King, Jun 9, 12:38:14
- Don't think he said it was lol (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jun 9, 12:40:05
- Of course they are, they're a union (NCFC) - King, Jun 9, 12:38:14
- And they are going to back lambert over us (n/m) (NCFC) - Jim, Jun 9, 12:36:13
- Plus again compare and contrast with Hughton (NCFC) - Jim, Jun 9, 12:31:45
- Do you not feel even a little bit guilty about calling Lambert a cunt? (NCFC) - King, Jun 9, 12:37:06
- Reflects badly on Lambert not the fans (n/m) (NCFC) - Larry Hagman, Jun 9, 13:36:13
- No. Great manager but he is a c**t. (NCFC) - Jim, Jun 9, 12:40:13
- Do you not feel even a little bit guilty about calling Lambert a cunt? (NCFC) - King, Jun 9, 12:37:06
- In fact it's not got anything to to with the premier league either (NCFC) - Jim, Jun 9, 12:29:33
- ^this (n/m) (NCFC) - Old Chelmsfordian, Jun 9, 12:33:40
- The LMA is the managers' union (NCFC) - King, Jun 9, 12:34:54
- Nursey is a cock and a Villa fan who would like nothing more... (NCFC) - Old Chelmsfordian, Jun 9, 12:06:05
- He's a Norwich fan. (n/m) (NCFC) - Yellalee, Jun 9, 12:07:46
- He's come across as quite the opposite. (n/m) (NCFC) - Old Chelmsfordian, Jun 9, 12:08:27
- Well, time has proven that not to be the case, tbh (NCFC) - Yellalee, Jun 9, 12:10:58
- Fair, but I can't help but think he gave it top spin when it was a mere rumour. (n/m) (NCFC) - Old Chelmsfordian, Jun 9, 12:15:11
- Journalist in controversy shocker (n/m) (NCFC) - Duck, Jun 9, 12:09:30
- Well, time has proven that not to be the case, tbh (NCFC) - Yellalee, Jun 9, 12:10:58
- He's come across as quite the opposite. (n/m) (NCFC) - Old Chelmsfordian, Jun 9, 12:08:27
- He's a Norwich fan. (n/m) (NCFC) - Yellalee, Jun 9, 12:07:46
- League Managers Association (NCFC) - norway, Jun 9, 11:41:13
- Oo er.... (NCFC) - DrDublin, Jun 9, 11:48:04
- But is that a fundamental clause of the contract allowing immediate termination (NCFC) - Jim, Jun 9, 12:35:23
- If he really has got a clause allowing him to talk to any Premier League club (NCFC) - Duck, Jun 9, 12:00:02
- But if the technicality or loophole existed, we were right to deny that (NCFC) - King, Jun 9, 12:04:25
- Depends how small the technicality is (NCFC) - Duck, Jun 9, 12:06:31
- Reckon technicality is this (NCFC) - promethian1, Jun 9, 12:10:35
- As I say (NCFC) - King, Jun 9, 12:09:53
- Depends how small the technicality is (NCFC) - Duck, Jun 9, 12:06:31
- Suppose could end up costing us, having to pay the court fees. (n/m) (NCFC) - DrDublin, Jun 9, 12:00:29
- if he has that clause we are wasting our time (NCFC) - phrankin, Jun 9, 12:03:18
- ignoring a clause would not necessary invalidate the contract (n/m) (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, Jun 9, 12:12:16
- This. Breach of one clause (if indeed there has been a breach) does not normally.... (NCFC) - Jim, Jun 9, 13:36:37
- ignoring a clause would not necessary invalidate the contract (n/m) (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, Jun 9, 12:12:16
- if he has that clause we are wasting our time (NCFC) - phrankin, Jun 9, 12:03:18
- But if the technicality or loophole existed, we were right to deny that (NCFC) - King, Jun 9, 12:04:25
- Oo er.... (NCFC) - DrDublin, Jun 9, 11:48:04
- Course they will back Lambert he's their member (NCFC) - Jim, Jun 9, 12:25:13
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.