not sure what that means. - Wrath of the Barclay

not sure what that means.

If Wes didn't want to be here 100%, he wouldn't have signed, is what I think I meant.

Posted By: mr chimp on March 9th 2011 at 09:40:34

Message Thread

Lambert Leaving If We Don't Go Up...? (NCFC) - Martin Peters, Mar 9, 09:29:44
- the thing is wes has been around a while like holt (NCFC) - SCC 28, Mar 9, 09:32:26
  - *nods* (NCFC) - mr chimp, Mar 9, 09:39:51
    - not sure what that means. (NCFC) - mr chimp, Mar 9, 09:40:34
      - Lollers. First message made sense to me on first read. I read it again after this post (NCFC) - megson, Mar 9, 09:43:02
      - no one else would have wanted him based on the relegation season! (n/m) (NCFC) - Jumbo1, Mar 9, 09:41:34
  - Agree entirely with this, our star players are not regarded as such, less vultures. (n/m) (NCFC) - megson, Mar 9, 09:39:03
- agree (n/m) (NCFC) - Jumbo1, Mar 9, 09:31:29
  - also think this team would just edge out Worthy's over 2 games (n/m) (NCFC) - Jumbo1, Mar 9, 09:32:31
    - The only reason Worthy's team would stand a chance is Hucks. (NCFC) - BINMEN8R, Mar 9, 09:35:48
      - Crofts is already twice the player Holt ever was. (n/m) (NCFC) - woody, Mar 9, 09:38:57
        
        Agree he's better but not twice as good..Holt was v good at his best. (n/m) (NCFC) - BINMEN8R, Mar 9, 09:44:46
        
        True story. The Scottish manager when asked why he wouldn't pick Holt... (NCFC) - woody, Mar 9, 09:50:31

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.