he scored his 7th goal on the 13th of Jan
i think OG was our top scorer on 5 at that time
Posted By: Ralf Scrampton on February 9th 2010 at 23:31:11
Message Thread
- Would this be WWII? (NCFC) - Jim Nasium, Feb 9, 22:02:23
- amazing how desperate we were for a striker last January, just like us not to recall him.. (NCFC) - Ralf Scrampton, Feb 9, 22:31:27
- Hindsight is really playing a part in this thread (NCFC) - pants, Feb 9, 22:48:47
- you're right, he's got off to a phenomenal start at Middlesboro (NCFC) - Ralf Scrampton, Feb 9, 23:14:25
- You mean like when Chris Martin by the 13th of Jan last season was on 3 goals (NCFC) - pants, Feb 9, 23:23:36
- he scored his 7th goal on the 13th of Jan (NCFC) - Ralf Scrampton, Feb 9, 23:31:11
- Soccerbase says 4 (NCFC) - pants, Feb 9, 23:39:11
- Actually my mistake, I was taking 13 of dec as jan (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Feb 9, 23:42:42
- from soccerbase (NCFC) - Ralf Scrampton, Feb 9, 23:42:38
- Soccerbase says 4 (NCFC) - pants, Feb 9, 23:39:11
- he scored his 7th goal on the 13th of Jan (NCFC) - Ralf Scrampton, Feb 9, 23:31:11
- doesn't make a jot of difference how good he turns out to be (NCFC) - Charles21, Feb 9, 23:16:14
- Possibly so - to be honest I have no idea how he is doing. I just noticed the (NCFC) - Yellalee, Feb 9, 23:18:01
- what gets me is the assumption that if you're 'anti-Roeder' one must immediately be 'pro-G (NCFC) - Ralf Scrampton, Feb 9, 23:24:38
- Yet your angle with Martin, is pro Gunn (NCFC) - pants, Feb 9, 23:37:54
- no, it's anti-Roeder pure and simple (n/m) (NCFC) - Ralf Scrampton, Feb 9, 23:46:42
- Yeah, this started as anti Roeder (NCFC) - pants, Feb 9, 23:56:01
- no, it's anti-Roeder pure and simple (n/m) (NCFC) - Ralf Scrampton, Feb 9, 23:46:42
- Very true. Still - it's all in the past now, and no need for snide comments either way (n/m) (NCFC) - Yellalee, Feb 9, 23:25:42
- Yet your angle with Martin, is pro Gunn (NCFC) - pants, Feb 9, 23:37:54
- what gets me is the assumption that if you're 'anti-Roeder' one must immediately be 'pro-G (NCFC) - Ralf Scrampton, Feb 9, 23:24:38
- Possibly so - to be honest I have no idea how he is doing. I just noticed the (NCFC) - Yellalee, Feb 9, 23:18:01
- You mean like when Chris Martin by the 13th of Jan last season was on 3 goals (NCFC) - pants, Feb 9, 23:23:36
- Killen wasn't up to it (NCFC) - Charles21, Feb 9, 23:13:27
- the family issues were the reason given for allowing him to return early (NCFC) - Ralf Scrampton, Feb 9, 23:20:03
- Hard to judge after only 60 minutes spread accross 4 sub appearances (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Feb 9, 23:16:35
- I though it was quite easy to judge to be honest (n/m) (NCFC) - KentonCanary, Feb 9, 23:21:42
- that's true (NCFC) - Charles21, Feb 9, 23:19:39
- It is, isn't it. I thought you spent a lot of time castigating Gunn for getting in (NCFC) - Yellalee, Feb 9, 23:13:05
- You're wrong (NCFC) - pants, Feb 9, 23:21:32
- Gunn was shit, so was Roeder (2nd season) (NCFC) - Ralf Scrampton, Feb 9, 23:28:12
- No I havent twisted it - I obviously got it wrong. Hence me asking you to correct me. (n/m) (NCFC) - Yellalee, Feb 9, 23:23:31
- You're wrong (NCFC) - pants, Feb 9, 23:21:32
- ... (NCFC) - Tombs, Feb 9, 22:56:31
- you're right, he's got off to a phenomenal start at Middlesboro (NCFC) - Ralf Scrampton, Feb 9, 23:14:25
- Gunn wanted to recall him (NCFC) - Black Creosote Time, Feb 9, 22:33:49
- if only we'd sacked the cunt a week earlier, at least he was stopped from doing a permanen (NCFC) - Ralf Scrampton, Feb 9, 23:04:13
- At the time, Martin hadn't earnt anything here, other than a 4 year contract, of which (NCFC) - pants, Feb 9, 23:06:35
- at a time when we were desperate for goals and strikers? (n/m) (NCFC) - Ralf Scrampton, Feb 9, 23:16:50
- Which is why hindsight is severely clouding your thoughts at the moment imo (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Feb 9, 23:25:48
- nope, i said as much at the time this was all going on (NCFC) - Ralf Scrampton, Feb 9, 23:39:03
- tbh Martin wasn't exactly a great shout (NCFC) - Charles21, Feb 9, 23:20:34
- absolutely agree with that, who was the alternative at the time though? (NCFC) - Ralf Scrampton, Feb 9, 23:35:44
- Lupoli at the time was some sort of weapon used against Roeder (NCFC) - pants, Feb 9, 23:49:31
- absolutely agree with that, who was the alternative at the time though? (NCFC) - Ralf Scrampton, Feb 9, 23:35:44
- Which is why hindsight is severely clouding your thoughts at the moment imo (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Feb 9, 23:25:48
- at a time when we were desperate for goals and strikers? (n/m) (NCFC) - Ralf Scrampton, Feb 9, 23:16:50
- At the time, Martin hadn't earnt anything here, other than a 4 year contract, of which (NCFC) - pants, Feb 9, 23:06:35
- if only we'd sacked the cunt a week earlier, at least he was stopped from doing a permanen (NCFC) - Ralf Scrampton, Feb 9, 23:04:13
- Hindsight is really playing a part in this thread (NCFC) - pants, Feb 9, 22:48:47
- thought beccles was in suffolk (NCFC) - Tombs, Feb 9, 22:07:58
- beccles, a fine town. (n/m) (NCFC) - grants_cold_finger, Feb 9, 23:00:36
- I'd like to say 'Beccles, the town that never sleeps' but that would be wrong because it (NCFC) - Bravo win or die, Feb 9, 22:11:58
- Bungay is immense (NCFC) - Tombs, Feb 9, 22:26:43
- He is a Beccles boy... (NCFC) - Fierce Panda, Feb 9, 22:20:12
- amazing how desperate we were for a striker last January, just like us not to recall him.. (NCFC) - Ralf Scrampton, Feb 9, 22:31:27
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.