At the time, Martin hadn't earnt anything here, other than a 4 year contract, of which
at least 2 here, he decided to be a complete immature t**t
His discipline at Luton wasn't exactly anything to write home about
But you obviously know better because he turned up for his 4th year and decided to act professional
Yeah, silly c**t Roeder, I take your point now
Posted By: pants on February 9th 2010 at 23:06:35
Message Thread
- Would this be WWII? (NCFC) - Jim Nasium, Feb 9, 22:02:23
- amazing how desperate we were for a striker last January, just like us not to recall him.. (NCFC) - Ralf Scrampton, Feb 9, 22:31:27
- Hindsight is really playing a part in this thread (NCFC) - pants, Feb 9, 22:48:47
- you're right, he's got off to a phenomenal start at Middlesboro (NCFC) - Ralf Scrampton, Feb 9, 23:14:25
- You mean like when Chris Martin by the 13th of Jan last season was on 3 goals (NCFC) - pants, Feb 9, 23:23:36
- he scored his 7th goal on the 13th of Jan (NCFC) - Ralf Scrampton, Feb 9, 23:31:11
- Soccerbase says 4 (NCFC) - pants, Feb 9, 23:39:11
- Actually my mistake, I was taking 13 of dec as jan (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Feb 9, 23:42:42
- from soccerbase (NCFC) - Ralf Scrampton, Feb 9, 23:42:38
- Soccerbase says 4 (NCFC) - pants, Feb 9, 23:39:11
- he scored his 7th goal on the 13th of Jan (NCFC) - Ralf Scrampton, Feb 9, 23:31:11
- doesn't make a jot of difference how good he turns out to be (NCFC) - Charles21, Feb 9, 23:16:14
- Possibly so - to be honest I have no idea how he is doing. I just noticed the (NCFC) - Yellalee, Feb 9, 23:18:01
- what gets me is the assumption that if you're 'anti-Roeder' one must immediately be 'pro-G (NCFC) - Ralf Scrampton, Feb 9, 23:24:38
- Yet your angle with Martin, is pro Gunn (NCFC) - pants, Feb 9, 23:37:54
- no, it's anti-Roeder pure and simple (n/m) (NCFC) - Ralf Scrampton, Feb 9, 23:46:42
- Yeah, this started as anti Roeder (NCFC) - pants, Feb 9, 23:56:01
- no, it's anti-Roeder pure and simple (n/m) (NCFC) - Ralf Scrampton, Feb 9, 23:46:42
- Very true. Still - it's all in the past now, and no need for snide comments either way (n/m) (NCFC) - Yellalee, Feb 9, 23:25:42
- Yet your angle with Martin, is pro Gunn (NCFC) - pants, Feb 9, 23:37:54
- what gets me is the assumption that if you're 'anti-Roeder' one must immediately be 'pro-G (NCFC) - Ralf Scrampton, Feb 9, 23:24:38
- Possibly so - to be honest I have no idea how he is doing. I just noticed the (NCFC) - Yellalee, Feb 9, 23:18:01
- You mean like when Chris Martin by the 13th of Jan last season was on 3 goals (NCFC) - pants, Feb 9, 23:23:36
- Killen wasn't up to it (NCFC) - Charles21, Feb 9, 23:13:27
- the family issues were the reason given for allowing him to return early (NCFC) - Ralf Scrampton, Feb 9, 23:20:03
- Hard to judge after only 60 minutes spread accross 4 sub appearances (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Feb 9, 23:16:35
- I though it was quite easy to judge to be honest (n/m) (NCFC) - KentonCanary, Feb 9, 23:21:42
- that's true (NCFC) - Charles21, Feb 9, 23:19:39
- It is, isn't it. I thought you spent a lot of time castigating Gunn for getting in (NCFC) - Yellalee, Feb 9, 23:13:05
- You're wrong (NCFC) - pants, Feb 9, 23:21:32
- Gunn was shit, so was Roeder (2nd season) (NCFC) - Ralf Scrampton, Feb 9, 23:28:12
- No I havent twisted it - I obviously got it wrong. Hence me asking you to correct me. (n/m) (NCFC) - Yellalee, Feb 9, 23:23:31
- You're wrong (NCFC) - pants, Feb 9, 23:21:32
- ... (NCFC) - Tombs, Feb 9, 22:56:31
- you're right, he's got off to a phenomenal start at Middlesboro (NCFC) - Ralf Scrampton, Feb 9, 23:14:25
- Gunn wanted to recall him (NCFC) - Black Creosote Time, Feb 9, 22:33:49
- if only we'd sacked the cunt a week earlier, at least he was stopped from doing a permanen (NCFC) - Ralf Scrampton, Feb 9, 23:04:13
- At the time, Martin hadn't earnt anything here, other than a 4 year contract, of which (NCFC) - pants, Feb 9, 23:06:35
- at a time when we were desperate for goals and strikers? (n/m) (NCFC) - Ralf Scrampton, Feb 9, 23:16:50
- Which is why hindsight is severely clouding your thoughts at the moment imo (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Feb 9, 23:25:48
- nope, i said as much at the time this was all going on (NCFC) - Ralf Scrampton, Feb 9, 23:39:03
- tbh Martin wasn't exactly a great shout (NCFC) - Charles21, Feb 9, 23:20:34
- absolutely agree with that, who was the alternative at the time though? (NCFC) - Ralf Scrampton, Feb 9, 23:35:44
- Lupoli at the time was some sort of weapon used against Roeder (NCFC) - pants, Feb 9, 23:49:31
- absolutely agree with that, who was the alternative at the time though? (NCFC) - Ralf Scrampton, Feb 9, 23:35:44
- Which is why hindsight is severely clouding your thoughts at the moment imo (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Feb 9, 23:25:48
- at a time when we were desperate for goals and strikers? (n/m) (NCFC) - Ralf Scrampton, Feb 9, 23:16:50
- At the time, Martin hadn't earnt anything here, other than a 4 year contract, of which (NCFC) - pants, Feb 9, 23:06:35
- if only we'd sacked the cunt a week earlier, at least he was stopped from doing a permanen (NCFC) - Ralf Scrampton, Feb 9, 23:04:13
- Hindsight is really playing a part in this thread (NCFC) - pants, Feb 9, 22:48:47
- thought beccles was in suffolk (NCFC) - Tombs, Feb 9, 22:07:58
- beccles, a fine town. (n/m) (NCFC) - grants_cold_finger, Feb 9, 23:00:36
- I'd like to say 'Beccles, the town that never sleeps' but that would be wrong because it (NCFC) - Bravo win or die, Feb 9, 22:11:58
- Bungay is immense (NCFC) - Tombs, Feb 9, 22:26:43
- He is a Beccles boy... (NCFC) - Fierce Panda, Feb 9, 22:20:12
- amazing how desperate we were for a striker last January, just like us not to recall him.. (NCFC) - Ralf Scrampton, Feb 9, 22:31:27
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.