yeah, but in retrospect he was miles better than Hoolahan even at his lowest ebb

Posted By: Worzel Scrimmage on August 24th 2009 at 23:32:11

Message Thread

Cracks me up all this "Get rid of Wes" stuff (NCFC) - South_West_Canary, Aug 24, 23:05:10
- Wes doesn't fit in with the style of play I've seen in the last two games (NCFC) - KentonCanary, Aug 24, 23:11:38
  - attacking is very promising, we look frightening at times (NCFC) - Tombs, Aug 24, 23:22:51
  - I often think he isn't given a lot of options & therefore has to try & retain position (NCFC) - South_West_Canary, Aug 24, 23:15:09
- he doesnt want to be here (n/m) (NCFC) - grants_cold_finger, Aug 24, 23:09:39
  - Well i dont think that was evident from his performance (n/m) (NCFC) - South_West_Canary, Aug 24, 23:12:35
- I think he could do well if used correctly (NCFC) - Worzel Scrimmage, Aug 24, 23:08:15
  - Same problem as when Hucks was here (NCFC) - BB_King, Aug 24, 23:10:55
    - the difference is that Hucks created things even when not playing well (NCFC) - Worzel Scrimmage, Aug 24, 23:13:26
      - Hang on - there was a time when virtually everyone was on Hucks back (n/m) (NCFC) - South_West_Canary, Aug 24, 23:17:41
        
        yeah, but in retrospect he was miles better than Hoolahan even at his lowest ebb (n/m) (NCFC) - Worzel Scrimmage, Aug 24, 23:32:11
      - Don't get me wrong (NCFC) - BB_King, Aug 24, 23:16:29
  - Play 5 in midfield - inc him (n/m) (NCFC) - South_West_Canary, Aug 24, 23:09:16
    - Then we lose out on an extra striker and score less goals (NCFC) - Ben, Aug 24, 23:13:11
      - And lets face it, apart from Holt all our strikers are shit (n/m) (NCFC) - South_West_Canary, Aug 24, 23:19:22
      - Not necessarily if M/F do their job & get up to support. Holt is good enough to hold ball (NCFC) - South_West_Canary, Aug 24, 23:18:15
        
        but our midfield isn't good enough (NCFC) - Ben, Aug 24, 23:25:18
    - don't recall us ever having a manager who was keen to use 352 (n/m) (NCFC) - Worzel Scrimmage, Aug 24, 23:12:06
      - I'm thinking 4-5-1 (n/m) (NCFC) - South_West_Canary, Aug 24, 23:15:33
      - Jesus, we can't defend with 4 defenders!!! (NCFC) - Ben, Aug 24, 23:14:30
        
        I was thinking, cut our losses and go for more ghouls! (NCFC) - Worzel Scrimmage, Aug 24, 23:33:35
        
        3-5-2 can be fairly defensive anyway if your two wingers can defend (n/m) (NCFC) - Worzel Scrimmage, Aug 24, 23:34:14

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.