I think he could do well if used correctly

but since we're shipping goals at the rate we are, we need to tighten up, which isn't easy with him in the team

Posted By: Worzel Scrimmage on August 24th 2009 at 23:08:15

Message Thread

Cracks me up all this "Get rid of Wes" stuff (NCFC) - South_West_Canary, Aug 24, 23:05:10
- Wes doesn't fit in with the style of play I've seen in the last two games (NCFC) - KentonCanary, Aug 24, 23:11:38
  - attacking is very promising, we look frightening at times (NCFC) - Tombs, Aug 24, 23:22:51
  - I often think he isn't given a lot of options & therefore has to try & retain position (NCFC) - South_West_Canary, Aug 24, 23:15:09
- he doesnt want to be here (n/m) (NCFC) - grants_cold_finger, Aug 24, 23:09:39
  - Well i dont think that was evident from his performance (n/m) (NCFC) - South_West_Canary, Aug 24, 23:12:35
- I think he could do well if used correctly (NCFC) - Worzel Scrimmage, Aug 24, 23:08:15
  - Same problem as when Hucks was here (NCFC) - BB_King, Aug 24, 23:10:55
    - the difference is that Hucks created things even when not playing well (NCFC) - Worzel Scrimmage, Aug 24, 23:13:26
      - Hang on - there was a time when virtually everyone was on Hucks back (n/m) (NCFC) - South_West_Canary, Aug 24, 23:17:41
        
        yeah, but in retrospect he was miles better than Hoolahan even at his lowest ebb (n/m) (NCFC) - Worzel Scrimmage, Aug 24, 23:32:11
      - Don't get me wrong (NCFC) - BB_King, Aug 24, 23:16:29
  - Play 5 in midfield - inc him (n/m) (NCFC) - South_West_Canary, Aug 24, 23:09:16
    - Then we lose out on an extra striker and score less goals (NCFC) - Ben, Aug 24, 23:13:11
      - And lets face it, apart from Holt all our strikers are shit (n/m) (NCFC) - South_West_Canary, Aug 24, 23:19:22
      - Not necessarily if M/F do their job & get up to support. Holt is good enough to hold ball (NCFC) - South_West_Canary, Aug 24, 23:18:15
        
        but our midfield isn't good enough (NCFC) - Ben, Aug 24, 23:25:18
    - don't recall us ever having a manager who was keen to use 352 (n/m) (NCFC) - Worzel Scrimmage, Aug 24, 23:12:06
      - I'm thinking 4-5-1 (n/m) (NCFC) - South_West_Canary, Aug 24, 23:15:33
      - Jesus, we can't defend with 4 defenders!!! (NCFC) - Ben, Aug 24, 23:14:30
        
        I was thinking, cut our losses and go for more ghouls! (NCFC) - Worzel Scrimmage, Aug 24, 23:33:35
        
        3-5-2 can be fairly defensive anyway if your two wingers can defend (n/m) (NCFC) - Worzel Scrimmage, Aug 24, 23:34:14

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.