do I?
Why do I?
Not why do I as in why you think I should. Why do I need to think that because you think I should?
Maybe now you and others who make out what I think, will get why I usually stay out of it, cos you're just stirring up situations "it's because pants thinks this"
Once you, doy, tricky, scramps, etc (the usual serial offenders of this) do this, it's never going to work out with me. And it's not just "pants can't handle a debate" or "pants can't stand it so he changes his name" those two remarks, along with others, are EXACTLY, what the problem is, not the subject, or the point, or who should agree with who
It's targetted way you lot go at me, whilst usually talking for me, or about me along the way
And your never going to stop doing it, because it gets you what you want. Saying it's not about the win, is just rollocks to me. It's exactly what you guys set out to do
I'd prefer any reply to remain here if possible, as you know how I feel about that, as do the others
Posted By: Totally on July 15th 2009 at 15:19:29
Message Thread
- I know pants has got up people's noses about managers (NCFC) - Old Git, Jul 15, 12:33:42
- i don't think many on here were in favour of Gunn getting the job permanantly though were (NCFC) - Ralf Scrampton, Jul 15, 12:45:49
- fans wanted someone who was city through and through (NCFC) - samcd84, Jul 15, 12:54:26
- Hmmm... (NCFC) - sheffieldcanary, Jul 15, 12:45:11
- I agree with all of that (n/m) (NCFC) - Charles21, Jul 15, 12:48:12
- I don't think that many rothers think Gunny's good or the best man for the job, but he's (NCFC) - stringersrevenge, Jul 15, 12:41:39
- And the fans - it was mostly our fault (n/m) (NCFC) - duke of york, Jul 15, 12:43:37
- mainly your fault (n/m) (NCFC) - Charles21, Jul 15, 12:45:11
- Agreed (NCFC) - duke of york, Jul 15, 12:49:55
- A little bit our fault for not taking Jon Otsemobor hostage until the end of the season (n/m) (NCFC) - stringersrevenge, Jul 15, 12:44:51
- Roeder should have had a good backup. (n/m) (NCFC) - sheffieldcanary, Jul 15, 12:55:14
- mainly your fault (n/m) (NCFC) - Charles21, Jul 15, 12:45:11
- And the fans - it was mostly our fault (n/m) (NCFC) - duke of york, Jul 15, 12:43:37
- pants has always got half a point (NCFC) - Steve in Holland, Jul 15, 12:41:03
- It's all about tone for me (NCFC) - Yellalee, Jul 15, 12:38:52
- I think everyone is in agreement with that (NCFC) - Brandonio, Jul 15, 12:38:48
- I completely agree with that (NCFC) - duke of york, Jul 15, 12:41:28
- A simple bit of maths (NCFC) - HoofinHughes, Jul 15, 13:01:53
- except when it isn't, which fucks up your theory (NCFC) - Totally, Jul 15, 13:25:47
- You against the world kiddo, keep fighting the fight! (n/m) (NCFC) - HoofinHughes, Jul 15, 13:29:59
- except when it isn't, which fucks up your theory (NCFC) - Totally, Jul 15, 13:25:47
- lol (NCFC) - Totally, Jul 15, 12:44:18
- Is that not correct then? (NCFC) - duke of york, Jul 15, 12:49:17
- leave it DOY (NCFC) - Charles21, Jul 15, 12:51:58
- Everyone leave it, never let it happen again (NCFC) - Totally, Jul 15, 12:57:20
- agreed (NCFC) - Charles21, Jul 15, 13:00:37
- Cool (NCFC) - Totally, Jul 15, 13:21:57
- I'm guessing that you're admitting to being a hypocrite - which is fine - everyone does it (n/m) (NCFC) - Brandonio, Jul 15, 14:13:49
- I'm admitting to it in the setup that was given to me (NCFC) - Totally, Jul 15, 14:45:14
- then you also have to accept (NCFC) - Charles21, Jul 15, 14:51:44
- I'm admitting to it in the setup that was given to me (NCFC) - Totally, Jul 15, 14:45:14
- I'm not after a win (NCFC) - Charles21, Jul 15, 13:28:16
- Agreed (n/m) (NCFC) - duke of york, Jul 15, 13:55:44
- I'm guessing that you're admitting to being a hypocrite - which is fine - everyone does it (n/m) (NCFC) - Brandonio, Jul 15, 14:13:49
- Cool (NCFC) - Totally, Jul 15, 13:21:57
- agreed (NCFC) - Charles21, Jul 15, 13:00:37
- Everyone leave it, never let it happen again (NCFC) - Totally, Jul 15, 12:57:20
- leave it DOY (NCFC) - Charles21, Jul 15, 12:51:58
- Is that not correct then? (NCFC) - duke of york, Jul 15, 12:49:17
- No he was anti Worthington (n/m) (NCFC) - stringersrevenge, Jul 15, 12:42:24
- Don't you see the pattern ? (NCFC) - Steve in Holland, Jul 15, 12:45:58
- or to give it another name (NCFC) - Ralf Scrampton, Jul 15, 12:49:07
- Fuck you, cuntbeak (NCFC) - Old Git, Jul 15, 12:51:51
- If he wasn't coming from the position of attacking Gunn to defend Roeder he's be less... (NCFC) - sheffieldcanary, Jul 15, 12:56:55
- Fuck you, cuntbeak (NCFC) - Old Git, Jul 15, 12:51:51
- or to give it another name (NCFC) - Ralf Scrampton, Jul 15, 12:49:07
- Don't you see the pattern ? (NCFC) - Steve in Holland, Jul 15, 12:45:58
- A simple bit of maths (NCFC) - HoofinHughes, Jul 15, 13:01:53
- I completely agree with that (NCFC) - duke of york, Jul 15, 12:41:28
- you've only brought this to the top to humiliate me (NCFC) - Charles21, Jul 15, 12:38:24
- exactly - this message board doesn't hold as much weight as some posters believe (n/m) (NCFC) - Brandonio, Jul 15, 12:40:25
- Unlike Paul McLarge (n/m) (NCFC) - Old Git, Jul 15, 12:42:31
- He's not a bad example though (NCFC) - Brandonio, Jul 15, 12:47:13
- Agree - WLYP will be chanted straight away (n/m) (NCFC) - duke of york, Jul 15, 12:49:39
- He's not a bad example though (NCFC) - Brandonio, Jul 15, 12:47:13
- Unlike Paul McLarge (n/m) (NCFC) - Old Git, Jul 15, 12:42:31
- You're good enough at humiliating yourself for me not to feel the need (n/m) (NCFC) - Old Git, Jul 15, 12:40:04
- exactly - this message board doesn't hold as much weight as some posters believe (n/m) (NCFC) - Brandonio, Jul 15, 12:40:25
- Is this some kind of joke? (NCFC) - beckford, Jul 15, 12:38:10
- I should have learnt the other day (NCFC) - Totally, Jul 15, 12:36:39
- oh ffs (NCFC) - Charles21, Jul 15, 12:39:56
- with you, responding (NCFC) - Totally, Jul 15, 12:42:01
- ^^^ Anyone got the slightest idea what they are on about? ^^^^^^ (n/m) (NCFC) - DNB41, Jul 15, 12:44:17
- another bout of cock jousting i think (NCFC) - Tombs, Jul 15, 12:48:56
- I've not changed a thing (NCFC) - Charles21, Jul 15, 12:43:52
- Leave it Charles (NCFC) - duke of york, Jul 15, 12:44:45
- irony (NCFC) - Totally, Jul 15, 12:47:19
- Or sound advice based on experience? (NCFC) - sheffieldcanary, Jul 15, 12:50:11
- irony (NCFC) - Totally, Jul 15, 12:47:19
- Leave it Charles (NCFC) - duke of york, Jul 15, 12:44:45
- ^^^ Anyone got the slightest idea what they are on about? ^^^^^^ (n/m) (NCFC) - DNB41, Jul 15, 12:44:17
- with you, responding (NCFC) - Totally, Jul 15, 12:42:01
- going back? (n/m) (NCFC) - Tombs, Jul 15, 12:37:58
- oh ffs (NCFC) - Charles21, Jul 15, 12:39:56
- ? (n/m) (NCFC) - Tombs, Jul 15, 12:36:35
- i agree with him on most things, not so much on Roeder though (NCFC) - samcd84, Jul 15, 12:35:26
- also (NCFC) - Totally, Jul 15, 12:39:48
- and allowed a gun to be shot on a submarine (NCFC) - Charles21, Jul 15, 12:50:27
- you suspend belief a bit from day 1, they all survived a plane crash (NCFC) - samcd84, Jul 15, 12:46:46
- They have though (NCFC) - Totally, Jul 15, 12:50:44
- I don't have a problem with off-island agents. It makes perfect sense. (NCFC) - sheffieldcanary, Jul 15, 13:03:44
- We'll see, (NCFC) - samcd84, Jul 15, 12:59:51
- That's been my hope all along (NCFC) - Totally, Jul 15, 13:07:18
- I have a mini theory on the end (NCFC) - Totally, Jul 15, 13:10:27
- You might be on to something there. (NCFC) - Ken Dodds Dads Dog, Jul 15, 13:12:18
- I have a mini theory on the end (NCFC) - Totally, Jul 15, 13:10:27
- it already is by miles (NCFC) - Charles21, Jul 15, 13:06:20
- That's been my hope all along (NCFC) - Totally, Jul 15, 13:07:18
- They have though (NCFC) - Totally, Jul 15, 12:50:44
- also (NCFC) - Totally, Jul 15, 12:39:48
- i don't think many on here were in favour of Gunn getting the job permanantly though were (NCFC) - Ralf Scrampton, Jul 15, 12:45:49
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.