that still doesn't really tally why if thorne was lazy and useless

why we'd keep him, Jarvis and Hendo would be better options on effort alone

The reason he was kept is because a fit peter thorne was a useful player to have. It's just unfortunate age and previous playing years and ailments have caught up with him

That's the grant sees it, the club see it, and I see it

Like I said before, it's up to you to see it differently and blow it up into something else, like most other fans do, but it doesn't mean it's the truth

Posted By: pants, Mar 15, 18:12:51