except that it does, because the club gains more from them going on loan

than Thorne going on loan (iirc they went on loan before the injury crisis)

and i've already pointed out that Thorne's age has nothing to do with him being constantly injured, but a fully fit Thorne may very well be a useful player to have at the club (not on what i've seen of him on those occasions when he has played for us which i've previously posted on here could be down to rustiness) but he's never fully fit!

the true test of whether Grant really sees it like you is if he offers him a new contract or not...

Posted By: blindasabat, Mar 15, 18:26:07