roeder's comments
"We were brilliant in the first half, there wasn't anything Sheffield Wednesday could do about our performance in the first half.
Laws would have given them a hell of a telling-off, they were that poor in the first half," he said.
so there wasn't anything sheffied wednesday could do because we were that brilliant in the first half, even though he admitted sheffield wednesday were 'that poor'.
is he just a bit thick? or is our brilliance measured by how bad the other team is?
Posted By: SCC 28 on November 30th 2008 at 09:17:27
Message Thread
- roeder's comments (NCFC) - SCC 28, Nov 30, 09:17:27
- It's quite simple really (NCFC) - The Judge, Nov 30, 10:33:27
- and in no way does he imply that because of our brilliance (NCFC) - SCC 28, Nov 30, 10:41:53
- plus telling your players how bad the oppo have been (NCFC) - SCC 28, Nov 30, 10:44:24
- i disagree (NCFC) - SCC 28, Nov 30, 10:40:22
- and in no way does he imply that because of our brilliance (NCFC) - SCC 28, Nov 30, 10:41:53
- you love it don't you (NCFC) - Tombs, Nov 30, 09:35:22
- so you don't find his comments bizarre (NCFC) - SCC 28, Nov 30, 09:44:37
- so then, bullet (NCFC) - Tombs, Nov 30, 09:49:36
- employing a manager without a record of consistent failure (NCFC) - SCC 28, Nov 30, 09:56:05
- plans=players lol (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Nov 30, 09:56:19
- employing a manager without a record of consistent failure (NCFC) - SCC 28, Nov 30, 09:56:05
- so then, bullet (NCFC) - Tombs, Nov 30, 09:49:36
- so you don't find his comments bizarre (NCFC) - SCC 28, Nov 30, 09:44:37
- It's quite simple really (NCFC) - The Judge, Nov 30, 10:33:27
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.