This is my point really, I've heard most of the attacks at Roeder
everyone has been used, from Chris Martin should be given a chance, as a snipe at our forward line, to Chadwick is loving it at MK dons, as a swipe at buying hoolihan
Loans are the main topic now, with general line of "I don't even know my team anymore" as the main dig of that, making out Norwich isn't team when we don't own the players
The players we do own don't perform near the standard required
I don't get the big deal of the loans, as Hamilton, Worthington and Grant all used loans, just Roeder has used more
The difference is, Roeders loans play a lot better than the previous 3 managers, yet it's something to attack him for
Like I said in the very first post, it seems patience is the problem here, and every straw is clutched at in droves when the power of suggestion is levelled
It also surprises me that a year is the benchmark for evaluation. Roeders just past that mark and after throwing 3 points away because of the stupidity of one of our players, the smell of the sack lingers
No matter the ill feeling which I can understand, I don't understand why that has to be overblown into the ridiculous
Posted By: pants on November 8th 2008 at 23:00:13
Message Thread
- Bit of perspective, it's not as bad as last year, or under hamilton (NCFC) - pants, Nov 8, 21:25:34
- Pattison cost ?500,000 (n/m) (NCFC) - happy clappy hughes, Nov 8, 21:59:45
- Not to mention loan fees of ?500,000 for Sib and ?300,000 for Bertrand (n/m) (NCFC) - happy clappy hughes, Nov 8, 22:01:41
- any links to where I can read these? (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Nov 8, 22:05:34
- Not to mention loan fees of ?500,000 for Sib and ?300,000 for Bertrand (n/m) (NCFC) - happy clappy hughes, Nov 8, 22:01:41
- I don't think anyone rational is saying it is (NCFC) - Holden Caulfield, Nov 8, 21:38:10
- I think that is big worry, a lot of our players, I admit , would.. (NCFC) - colincanary, Nov 8, 21:43:42
- and roeder hates the fans (NCFC) - SCC 28, Nov 8, 21:41:16
- You just said we're not much better than when Grant was here (NCFC) - pants, Nov 8, 21:40:31
- What I meant was 19th isn't that much better than (NCFC) - Holden Caulfield, Nov 8, 22:35:33
- This is my point really, I've heard most of the attacks at Roeder (NCFC) - pants, Nov 8, 23:00:13
- he means in terms of match performance too (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Nov 8, 21:42:19
- When did grant beat the top team of the division 5-2 in his (NCFC) - pants, Nov 8, 21:44:37
- 4 points at home to 2 good teams (NCFC) - SCC 28, Nov 8, 21:47:30
- I knew it wasn't worth much of an effort (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Nov 8, 21:56:46
- we doubled Brum under Grant, won at West Brom... (n/m) (NCFC) - colincanary, Nov 8, 21:46:23
- Yeah, I know, but that was when we stil had decent players (NCFC) - pants, Nov 8, 21:55:38
- 4 points at home to 2 good teams (NCFC) - SCC 28, Nov 8, 21:47:30
- When did grant beat the top team of the division 5-2 in his (NCFC) - pants, Nov 8, 21:44:37
- What I meant was 19th isn't that much better than (NCFC) - Holden Caulfield, Nov 8, 22:35:33
- Pattison cost ?500,000 (n/m) (NCFC) - happy clappy hughes, Nov 8, 21:59:45
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.