but in the original article it doesnt say if the bet was on a team winning

could have been a sending off or anything. I know that isnt the case after the latest times article but my point was that he shouldnt have been calling people retards for not believing two strangers

Posted By: grimsbycanary3 on October 17th 2008 at 08:43:06

Message Thread

FAO: grimsbycanary3 (NCFC) - conker, Oct 16, 19:37:47
- thank you! (NCFC) - SCC 28, Oct 16, 19:51:09
  - Except conker's not saying he was watching the asian markets (NCFC) - BerlinCanary, Oct 16, 21:51:50
    - er no he didn't say that at all (NCFC) - SCC 28, Oct 16, 21:56:30
      - "I've checked back today and based on what we supplied" (NCFC) - BerlinCanary, Oct 16, 22:12:17
        
        well he does have facts on it (NCFC) - SCC 28, Oct 16, 22:16:02
      - so basically the info he supplied (NCFC) - SCC 28, Oct 16, 21:57:28
        
        so that's 3 different sources for the unexplained movement (NCFC) - SCC 28, Oct 16, 21:59:15
        
        conker isn't a source for the unexplained odds movement (NCFC) - BerlinCanary, Oct 16, 22:18:33
        
        or by the score (0-1 Derby) (NCFC) - Charles21, Oct 16, 22:45:02
        
        yes but he had access and was viewing them! (NCFC) - SCC 28, Oct 16, 22:23:52
        
        Was he? (NCFC) - BerlinCanary, Oct 16, 22:42:05
        
        ok he picked up the odds at the time when he looked back (NCFC) - SCC 28, Oct 16, 22:44:22
        
        cos this better be fucking marvellous (NCFC) - SCC 28, Oct 16, 22:45:17
        
        from telegraph site (NCFC) - SCC 28, Oct 16, 22:29:21
        
        i think what people are saying is that if conker (NCFC) - grimsbycanary3, Oct 16, 22:27:26
        
        The half time score was 1-0 to Derby (NCFC) - Charles21, Oct 16, 22:47:08
        
        but in the original article it doesnt say if the bet was on a team winning (NCFC) - grimsbycanary3, Oct 17, 08:43:06
        
        hooray!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!! (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Oct 16, 22:48:07
        
        agree with that (n/m) (NCFC) - Charles21, Oct 16, 22:53:32
        
        cos there would be no reason to make it up? (NCFC) - SCC 28, Oct 16, 22:33:26
        
        so what is the reason for people making up rumours on here? (n/m) (NCFC) - grimsbycanary3, Oct 16, 22:37:48
        
        yes but these are facts which will come out (NCFC) - SCC 28, Oct 16, 22:40:11
        
        you really dont get it do you (n/m) (NCFC) - grimsbycanary3, Oct 17, 08:43:35
  - god shut the fuck up (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Oct 16, 20:46:21
    - he is right though I reckon (n/m) (NCFC) - Brandonio, Oct 16, 20:48:32
      - It's not that which is the problem, it's the whole I'm right are you mentally ill act (NCFC) - pants, Oct 16, 20:52:40
        
        i've been going on about it (NCFC) - SCC 28, Oct 16, 21:00:16
        
        well why have so many people had trouble (NCFC) - SCC 28, Oct 16, 20:59:25
        
        and why cant you understand that some people like myself dont know conker (NCFC) - grimsbycanary3, Oct 16, 21:42:43
        
        hmmm ok but (NCFC) - SCC 28, Oct 16, 21:49:51
        
        well there you go (NCFC) - grimsbycanary3, Oct 16, 22:03:07
        
        now you're just being silly (NCFC) - SCC 28, Oct 16, 22:07:01
        
        you have 2 that back up your theory (NCFC) - grimsbycanary3, Oct 16, 22:10:24
        
        weekend report (NCFC) - SCC 28, Oct 16, 22:13:42
        
        it's not a theory (NCFC) - SCC 28, Oct 16, 22:12:25
        
        apologies i got that wrong (NCFC) - grimsbycanary3, Oct 16, 22:19:01
        
        It's not often he's right, so it's understandable. bless him (n/m) (NCFC) - Brandonio, Oct 16, 20:53:55
        
        lol (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Oct 16, 20:59:40

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.