yes but he had access and was viewing them!

i very much doubt many people were.

of course he knows no more. i'm just saying he knew how the odds changed. if let's say all the money was for derby mid way through the 2nd half, then we'd have reason to wonder about marshall.

Posted By: SCC 28 on October 16th 2008 at 22:23:52

Message Thread

FAO: grimsbycanary3 (NCFC) - conker, Oct 16, 19:37:47
- thank you! (NCFC) - SCC 28, Oct 16, 19:51:09
  - Except conker's not saying he was watching the asian markets (NCFC) - BerlinCanary, Oct 16, 21:51:50
    - er no he didn't say that at all (NCFC) - SCC 28, Oct 16, 21:56:30
      - "I've checked back today and based on what we supplied" (NCFC) - BerlinCanary, Oct 16, 22:12:17
        
        well he does have facts on it (NCFC) - SCC 28, Oct 16, 22:16:02
      - so basically the info he supplied (NCFC) - SCC 28, Oct 16, 21:57:28
        
        so that's 3 different sources for the unexplained movement (NCFC) - SCC 28, Oct 16, 21:59:15
        
        conker isn't a source for the unexplained odds movement (NCFC) - BerlinCanary, Oct 16, 22:18:33
        
        or by the score (0-1 Derby) (NCFC) - Charles21, Oct 16, 22:45:02
        
        yes but he had access and was viewing them! (NCFC) - SCC 28, Oct 16, 22:23:52
        
        Was he? (NCFC) - BerlinCanary, Oct 16, 22:42:05
        
        ok he picked up the odds at the time when he looked back (NCFC) - SCC 28, Oct 16, 22:44:22
        
        cos this better be fucking marvellous (NCFC) - SCC 28, Oct 16, 22:45:17
        
        from telegraph site (NCFC) - SCC 28, Oct 16, 22:29:21
        
        i think what people are saying is that if conker (NCFC) - grimsbycanary3, Oct 16, 22:27:26
        
        The half time score was 1-0 to Derby (NCFC) - Charles21, Oct 16, 22:47:08
        
        but in the original article it doesnt say if the bet was on a team winning (NCFC) - grimsbycanary3, Oct 17, 08:43:06
        
        hooray!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!! (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Oct 16, 22:48:07
        
        agree with that (n/m) (NCFC) - Charles21, Oct 16, 22:53:32
        
        cos there would be no reason to make it up? (NCFC) - SCC 28, Oct 16, 22:33:26
        
        so what is the reason for people making up rumours on here? (n/m) (NCFC) - grimsbycanary3, Oct 16, 22:37:48
        
        yes but these are facts which will come out (NCFC) - SCC 28, Oct 16, 22:40:11
        
        you really dont get it do you (n/m) (NCFC) - grimsbycanary3, Oct 17, 08:43:35
  - god shut the fuck up (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Oct 16, 20:46:21
    - he is right though I reckon (n/m) (NCFC) - Brandonio, Oct 16, 20:48:32
      - It's not that which is the problem, it's the whole I'm right are you mentally ill act (NCFC) - pants, Oct 16, 20:52:40
        
        i've been going on about it (NCFC) - SCC 28, Oct 16, 21:00:16
        
        well why have so many people had trouble (NCFC) - SCC 28, Oct 16, 20:59:25
        
        and why cant you understand that some people like myself dont know conker (NCFC) - grimsbycanary3, Oct 16, 21:42:43
        
        hmmm ok but (NCFC) - SCC 28, Oct 16, 21:49:51
        
        well there you go (NCFC) - grimsbycanary3, Oct 16, 22:03:07
        
        now you're just being silly (NCFC) - SCC 28, Oct 16, 22:07:01
        
        you have 2 that back up your theory (NCFC) - grimsbycanary3, Oct 16, 22:10:24
        
        weekend report (NCFC) - SCC 28, Oct 16, 22:13:42
        
        it's not a theory (NCFC) - SCC 28, Oct 16, 22:12:25
        
        apologies i got that wrong (NCFC) - grimsbycanary3, Oct 16, 22:19:01
        
        It's not often he's right, so it's understandable. bless him (n/m) (NCFC) - Brandonio, Oct 16, 20:53:55
        
        lol (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Oct 16, 20:59:40

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.