absolutely, assuming he is not legally our player, should QPR Bid the £250K

and he sign a contract with them, they could then pay livingston the extra £125K to end the wrangle and the player move.

Posted By: phrankin on June 14th 2008 at 10:34:37

Message Thread

I got slated by someone earlier today for questioning our (NCFC) - BINMEN8R, Jun 13, 22:35:09
- absolutely, assuming he is not legally our player, should QPR Bid the £250K (NCFC) - phrankin, Jun 14, 10:34:37
  - That's a ridiculous assumption (n/m) (NCFC) - Mr Creosote, Jun 14, 10:50:22
    - thats phrankin. (n/m) (NCFC) - NCFC4life, Jun 14, 11:01:50
      - why not.... pay Blackpool 250K then pay another 125K (NCFC) - phrankin, Jun 14, 14:03:32
- Lovely to read on the official site (NCFC) - Fozzybear, Jun 13, 22:50:13
  - That I 100% agree with. I think this club keeps us well in the dark regarding signings (n/m) (NCFC) - LincolnshireCanary, Jun 13, 22:53:43
    - Not helped by the fact that none of the local journos (NCFC) - Fozzybear, Jun 13, 22:58:35
      - That is bang on. You used to be able to rely on the EN/EDP (NCFC) - Jim, Jun 13, 23:07:03
- But Blackpool HAVE to accept £250K so it makes no difference (NCFC) - Jim, Jun 13, 22:46:58
- we're fucked tbh (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jun 13, 22:38:29
  - Agreed (n/m) (NCFC) - BINMEN8R, Jun 13, 22:41:04
- He's signed a contract with us. I think if he signed elsewhere we'd be miffed (n/m) (NCFC) - LincolnshireCanary, Jun 13, 22:37:23
  - He signed a contract with us? (NCFC) - Mr Creosote, Jun 13, 22:48:25
    - the voices? (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jun 13, 22:57:26
      - Oh yeah (n/m) (NCFC) - Mr Creosote, Jun 13, 22:59:05
  - If he's signed(and I hope he has) why does Archant have to (NCFC) - BINMEN8R, Jun 13, 22:40:27
    - Because the club don't tell them anything anymore so they have to guess! (n/m) (NCFC) - Jim, Jun 13, 22:43:49
  - where? (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jun 13, 22:39:00
    - Because he's not registered as ours yet. (n/m) (NCFC) - LincolnshireCanary, Jun 13, 22:42:37
      - a lot of people just talking bollocks imo (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jun 13, 22:44:57
        
        If that's what you believe (NCFC) - LincolnshireCanary, Jun 13, 22:48:07
        
        who has been saying it? (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jun 13, 22:57:42
        
        Well there was (NCFC) - Mr Creosote, Jun 13, 23:03:21
        
        or it's a secret that everyone knows (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jun 13, 23:06:42
        
        I think I may be out of the loop here (NCFC) - Mr Creosote, Jun 13, 23:08:34
        
        i'm wondering that too (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jun 13, 23:12:49
      - So can he sign for someone else and tear up his reported 'signed' contract with us? (n/m) (NCFC) - BINMEN8R, Jun 13, 22:44:35
        
        No, a signed contract is binding (n/m) (NCFC) - LincolnshireCanary, Jun 13, 22:48:25
        
        Not really. He could but we could then sue him and possibly get an injunction (NCFC) - Jim, Jun 13, 22:48:07
        
        A bit like the Obi Mikel or Mikel Obi situation between Chelski and Man Utd (n/m) (NCFC) - LincolnshireCanary, Jun 13, 22:50:28

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.