Sheffield United had a decent case however
comments from the fa about not peeing off the fans and how it would be unfair to relegate west ham in that matter were a disgrace.
Posted By: phrankin on April 22nd 2008 at 16:24:12
Message Thread
- so what if (NCFC) - south, Apr 22, 16:00:49
- we'd look like right prats if we made a fuss (NCFC) - mr carra, Apr 22, 16:16:50
- None of the precedents were equivalent though (NCFC) - Jim, Apr 22, 17:35:22
- how do you know that? (NCFC) - Tricky Hawes, Apr 22, 17:23:18
- Precedents don't alter the fact that the rule is pointless (NCFC) - yarmyyarmy, Apr 22, 16:28:10
- It wouldnt surprise me if Wednesday did it again (NCFC) - phrankin, Apr 22, 16:32:40
- we could too (NCFC) - mr carra, Apr 22, 16:36:27
- we could have a stronger bench ( Do we even have 6 loanees now?) (n/m) (NCFC) - phrankin, Apr 22, 16:37:44
- No, because we had to send one back (NCFC) - Tricky Hawes, Apr 22, 17:20:36
- ^^^ not quite true (NCFC) - blindasabat, Apr 22, 17:29:55
- No, because we had to send one back (NCFC) - Tricky Hawes, Apr 22, 17:20:36
- we could have a stronger bench ( Do we even have 6 loanees now?) (n/m) (NCFC) - phrankin, Apr 22, 16:37:44
- we could too (NCFC) - mr carra, Apr 22, 16:36:27
- I presume the poenalty would be more severe if all the loan players actually played (n/m) (NCFC) - mr carra, Apr 22, 16:31:33
- In which case, just have that as the rule and leave the other clause out. (n/m) (NCFC) - yarmyyarmy, Apr 22, 16:33:37
- I agree totally (NCFC) - mr carra, Apr 22, 16:35:34
- In which case, just have that as the rule and leave the other clause out. (n/m) (NCFC) - yarmyyarmy, Apr 22, 16:33:37
- It wouldnt surprise me if Wednesday did it again (NCFC) - phrankin, Apr 22, 16:32:40
- à la Sheff Utd last year (n/m) (NCFC) - Yellalee, Apr 22, 16:18:53
- Sheffield United had a decent case however (NCFC) - phrankin, Apr 22, 16:24:12
- But they weren't worried until it affected them. Same as us. Stoke wouldn't (NCFC) - Yellalee, Apr 22, 16:27:17
- But almost everyone agreed with Sheffield, I guess the FA were happy (NCFC) - phrankin, Apr 22, 16:31:53
- what do mean by use them? (NCFC) - mr carra, Apr 22, 16:34:19
- give you a stronger bench of course (NCFC) - phrankin, Apr 22, 16:35:55
- what do mean by use them? (NCFC) - mr carra, Apr 22, 16:34:19
- But almost everyone agreed with Sheffield, I guess the FA were happy (NCFC) - phrankin, Apr 22, 16:31:53
- But they weren't worried until it affected them. Same as us. Stoke wouldn't (NCFC) - Yellalee, Apr 22, 16:27:17
- exactly (n/m) (NCFC) - mr carra, Apr 22, 16:20:46
- Sheffield United had a decent case however (NCFC) - phrankin, Apr 22, 16:24:12
- Or in fact if they send us down on goal difference (n/m) (NCFC) - Jim, Apr 22, 16:02:06
- we'd look like right prats if we made a fuss (NCFC) - mr carra, Apr 22, 16:16:50
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.