Except that "pedanted" and "pedanter" aren't words.
Posted By: yarmyyarmy on April 22nd 2008 at 15:55:39
Message Thread
- If we avoid relegation, would you regard our season as a success? (n/m) (NCFC) - WOTB No1 Tipster 04, Apr 22, 15:10:29
- the season as whole no, Roeder's part of it yes (n/m) (NCFC) - mr carra, Apr 22, 16:17:52
- this year has not been successful. at all. (n/m) (NCFC) - shoddy, Apr 22, 15:41:26
- No, this season has been a failure (NCFC) - phrankin, Apr 22, 15:40:40
- *there* (NCFC) - megson, Apr 22, 15:43:31
- Except that "pedanted" and "pedanter" aren't words. (n/m) (NCFC) - yarmyyarmy, Apr 22, 15:55:39
- good pedantry yarmy! (n/m) (NCFC) - phrankin, Apr 22, 16:13:31
- thanks! you can't beat the feeling of being Pedanted, even by a novice! (NCFC) - phrankin, Apr 22, 15:44:54
- Did someone call? (n/m) (NCFC) - Yellalee, Apr 22, 15:50:31
- Except that "pedanted" and "pedanter" aren't words. (n/m) (NCFC) - yarmyyarmy, Apr 22, 15:55:39
- *there* (NCFC) - megson, Apr 22, 15:43:31
- Being that we were doomed by November, I'd say yes. (n/m) (NCFC) - tim berry, Apr 22, 15:28:16
- after the way i felt watching QPR (a) (NCFC) - samcd84, Apr 22, 15:14:32
- oh god don't remind me. (NCFC) - megson, Apr 22, 15:24:32
- Sort of agree, yet I keep seeing threads like "god, when Hucks and Dublin retire what are (NCFC) - pants, Apr 22, 15:28:55
- it wunt though. (NCFC) - megson, Apr 22, 15:44:43
- top half has to be the aim IMO (NCFC) - phrankin, Apr 22, 16:22:36
- thats cos on paper some of Grants signings looked promising (NCFC) - phrankin, Apr 22, 15:42:02
- on the sideline he did have a lot of bits of paper though (NCFC) - mr carra, Apr 22, 16:20:22
- also, on recent form, many talk about how poor we play with fotheringham suring up the (NCFC) - pants, Apr 22, 15:46:26
- I still think Duffy was far worse for NCFC than Grant (NCFC) - phrankin, Apr 22, 16:21:52
- how on god's green earth do you know that?? (n/m) (NCFC) - Charles21, Apr 22, 16:45:49
- it was for the taking in some ways. (NCFC) - megson, Apr 22, 15:50:22
- oh and Marsh i suppose, possibly Gilks. (NCFC) - megson, Apr 22, 15:52:41
- *without fotheringham in the title* (NCFC) - pants, Apr 22, 15:48:10
- I still think Duffy was far worse for NCFC than Grant (NCFC) - phrankin, Apr 22, 16:21:52
- it wunt though. (NCFC) - megson, Apr 22, 15:44:43
- have (n/m) (NCFC) - Arizona Bay, Apr 22, 15:25:40
- Sort of agree, yet I keep seeing threads like "god, when Hucks and Dublin retire what are (NCFC) - pants, Apr 22, 15:28:55
- second that.....after watching charlton (a) (n/m) (NCFC) - Dirty Delia, Apr 22, 15:15:57
- oh god don't remind me. (NCFC) - megson, Apr 22, 15:24:32
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.