oh and Marsh i suppose, possibly Gilks.

SO he wasn't all bad.
He also didn't want to lose earnie or etuhu so can't blame him for that.
Saffers was a wierd one.

Posted By: megson on April 22nd 2008 at 15:52:41

Message Thread

If we avoid relegation, would you regard our season as a success? (n/m) (NCFC) - WOTB No1 Tipster 04, Apr 22, 15:10:29
- the season as whole no, Roeder's part of it yes (n/m) (NCFC) - mr carra, Apr 22, 16:17:52
- this year has not been successful. at all. (n/m) (NCFC) - shoddy, Apr 22, 15:41:26
- No, this season has been a failure (NCFC) - phrankin, Apr 22, 15:40:40
  - *there* (NCFC) - megson, Apr 22, 15:43:31
    - Except that "pedanted" and "pedanter" aren't words. (n/m) (NCFC) - yarmyyarmy, Apr 22, 15:55:39
      - good pedantry yarmy! (n/m) (NCFC) - phrankin, Apr 22, 16:13:31
    - thanks! you can't beat the feeling of being Pedanted, even by a novice! (NCFC) - phrankin, Apr 22, 15:44:54
      - Did someone call? (n/m) (NCFC) - Yellalee, Apr 22, 15:50:31
- Being that we were doomed by November, I'd say yes. (n/m) (NCFC) - tim berry, Apr 22, 15:28:16
- after the way i felt watching QPR (a) (NCFC) - samcd84, Apr 22, 15:14:32
  - oh god don't remind me. (NCFC) - megson, Apr 22, 15:24:32
    - Sort of agree, yet I keep seeing threads like "god, when Hucks and Dublin retire what are (NCFC) - pants, Apr 22, 15:28:55
      - it wunt though. (NCFC) - megson, Apr 22, 15:44:43
        
        top half has to be the aim IMO (NCFC) - phrankin, Apr 22, 16:22:36
      - thats cos on paper some of Grants signings looked promising (NCFC) - phrankin, Apr 22, 15:42:02
        
        on the sideline he did have a lot of bits of paper though (NCFC) - mr carra, Apr 22, 16:20:22
        
        also, on recent form, many talk about how poor we play with fotheringham suring up the (NCFC) - pants, Apr 22, 15:46:26
        
        I still think Duffy was far worse for NCFC than Grant (NCFC) - phrankin, Apr 22, 16:21:52
        
        how on god's green earth do you know that?? (n/m) (NCFC) - Charles21, Apr 22, 16:45:49
        
        it was for the taking in some ways. (NCFC) - megson, Apr 22, 15:50:22
        
        oh and Marsh i suppose, possibly Gilks. (NCFC) - megson, Apr 22, 15:52:41
        
        *without fotheringham in the title* (NCFC) - pants, Apr 22, 15:48:10
    - have (n/m) (NCFC) - Arizona Bay, Apr 22, 15:25:40
  - second that.....after watching charlton (a) (n/m) (NCFC) - Dirty Delia, Apr 22, 15:15:57

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.