also, on recent form, many talk about how poor we play with fotheringham suring up the
middle
That's the same fotheringham that was injured early doors along with Brellier and Murray
I'm going to get told I kiss grants arse now but some facts about earlier match current trends and form and prove that we aren't as good as we think
This league certainly wasn't for the taking for us
Posted By: pants on April 22nd 2008 at 15:46:26
Message Thread
- If we avoid relegation, would you regard our season as a success? (n/m) (NCFC) - WOTB No1 Tipster 04, Apr 22, 15:10:29
- the season as whole no, Roeder's part of it yes (n/m) (NCFC) - mr carra, Apr 22, 16:17:52
- this year has not been successful. at all. (n/m) (NCFC) - shoddy, Apr 22, 15:41:26
- No, this season has been a failure (NCFC) - phrankin, Apr 22, 15:40:40
- *there* (NCFC) - megson, Apr 22, 15:43:31
- Except that "pedanted" and "pedanter" aren't words. (n/m) (NCFC) - yarmyyarmy, Apr 22, 15:55:39
- good pedantry yarmy! (n/m) (NCFC) - phrankin, Apr 22, 16:13:31
- thanks! you can't beat the feeling of being Pedanted, even by a novice! (NCFC) - phrankin, Apr 22, 15:44:54
- Did someone call? (n/m) (NCFC) - Yellalee, Apr 22, 15:50:31
- Except that "pedanted" and "pedanter" aren't words. (n/m) (NCFC) - yarmyyarmy, Apr 22, 15:55:39
- *there* (NCFC) - megson, Apr 22, 15:43:31
- Being that we were doomed by November, I'd say yes. (n/m) (NCFC) - tim berry, Apr 22, 15:28:16
- after the way i felt watching QPR (a) (NCFC) - samcd84, Apr 22, 15:14:32
- oh god don't remind me. (NCFC) - megson, Apr 22, 15:24:32
- Sort of agree, yet I keep seeing threads like "god, when Hucks and Dublin retire what are (NCFC) - pants, Apr 22, 15:28:55
- it wunt though. (NCFC) - megson, Apr 22, 15:44:43
- top half has to be the aim IMO (NCFC) - phrankin, Apr 22, 16:22:36
- thats cos on paper some of Grants signings looked promising (NCFC) - phrankin, Apr 22, 15:42:02
- on the sideline he did have a lot of bits of paper though (NCFC) - mr carra, Apr 22, 16:20:22
- also, on recent form, many talk about how poor we play with fotheringham suring up the (NCFC) - pants, Apr 22, 15:46:26
- I still think Duffy was far worse for NCFC than Grant (NCFC) - phrankin, Apr 22, 16:21:52
- how on god's green earth do you know that?? (n/m) (NCFC) - Charles21, Apr 22, 16:45:49
- it was for the taking in some ways. (NCFC) - megson, Apr 22, 15:50:22
- oh and Marsh i suppose, possibly Gilks. (NCFC) - megson, Apr 22, 15:52:41
- *without fotheringham in the title* (NCFC) - pants, Apr 22, 15:48:10
- I still think Duffy was far worse for NCFC than Grant (NCFC) - phrankin, Apr 22, 16:21:52
- it wunt though. (NCFC) - megson, Apr 22, 15:44:43
- have (n/m) (NCFC) - Arizona Bay, Apr 22, 15:25:40
- Sort of agree, yet I keep seeing threads like "god, when Hucks and Dublin retire what are (NCFC) - pants, Apr 22, 15:28:55
- second that.....after watching charlton (a) (n/m) (NCFC) - Dirty Delia, Apr 22, 15:15:57
- oh god don't remind me. (NCFC) - megson, Apr 22, 15:24:32
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.