Indeed

If our problem was a lack of physicality Hucks was hardly going to help that. And as you say he's already lost a few yards pace. I can understand after so many impressive seasons why fans still look to him to turn a match, but sadly those days are gone, and even if he was at his very best I don't think he could done anything about the result today. Again, as you say, Leicester were due a win and we were due a defeat. The important is not to get bogged down in recriminations such as these. Roeder has done the business so far - it's going to take a lot more than one (albeit heavy) loss to question his judgment.

Posted By: King on February 16th 2008 at 20:17:03

Message Thread

Ahem. All of you moaning about Hucks' omission today... (NCFC) - King, Feb 16, 19:54:10
- So two right wingers starting was a good decision? (n/m) (NCFC) - phrankin, Feb 16, 19:56:17
- Don't think it's 'just today' King. (n/m) (NCFC) - Andyjzr, Feb 16, 19:55:02
  - Perhaps not (NCFC) - King, Feb 16, 19:59:17
    - Look down the board, people were questioning the decision pre match. (n/m) (NCFC) - phrankin, Feb 16, 20:02:03
      - I don't doubt it (NCFC) - King, Feb 16, 20:06:17
        
        The team today were not strong enough, LCFC played a very physical game... (NCFC) - wgf500, Feb 16, 20:10:34
        
        Indeed (NCFC) - King, Feb 16, 20:17:03
        
        Argh. I won't even begin to correct the SPAG in that (NCFC) - King, Feb 16, 20:19:00
        
        exaclty, the performance was god awful... (NCFC) - wgf500, Feb 16, 20:18:48

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.