I don't doubt it
Perhaps Roeder was wrong. Who knows? What I'm putting to you is that it is frankly absurd to suggest that one player (or at least Hucks) could have such a vast influence on a match.
Posted By: King on February 16th 2008 at 20:06:17
Message Thread
- Ahem. All of you moaning about Hucks' omission today... (NCFC) - King, Feb 16, 19:54:10
- So two right wingers starting was a good decision? (n/m) (NCFC) - phrankin, Feb 16, 19:56:17
- Don't think it's 'just today' King. (n/m) (NCFC) - Andyjzr, Feb 16, 19:55:02
- Perhaps not (NCFC) - King, Feb 16, 19:59:17
- Look down the board, people were questioning the decision pre match. (n/m) (NCFC) - phrankin, Feb 16, 20:02:03
- I don't doubt it (NCFC) - King, Feb 16, 20:06:17
- The team today were not strong enough, LCFC played a very physical game... (NCFC) - wgf500, Feb 16, 20:10:34
- Indeed (NCFC) - King, Feb 16, 20:17:03
- Argh. I won't even begin to correct the SPAG in that (NCFC) - King, Feb 16, 20:19:00
- exaclty, the performance was god awful... (NCFC) - wgf500, Feb 16, 20:18:48
- Indeed (NCFC) - King, Feb 16, 20:17:03
- The team today were not strong enough, LCFC played a very physical game... (NCFC) - wgf500, Feb 16, 20:10:34
- I don't doubt it (NCFC) - King, Feb 16, 20:06:17
- Look down the board, people were questioning the decision pre match. (n/m) (NCFC) - phrankin, Feb 16, 20:02:03
- Perhaps not (NCFC) - King, Feb 16, 19:59:17
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.