Perhaps not
But consider these two questions:
- Had we won today would you have been upset about Hucks?
- Would we have certainly reversed a four goal deficit with the presence of one player along?
I challenge you to justifiably answer 'yes' to either of them.
Posted By: King on February 16th 2008 at 19:59:17
Message Thread
- Ahem. All of you moaning about Hucks' omission today... (NCFC) - King, Feb 16, 19:54:10
- So two right wingers starting was a good decision? (n/m) (NCFC) - phrankin, Feb 16, 19:56:17
- Don't think it's 'just today' King. (n/m) (NCFC) - Andyjzr, Feb 16, 19:55:02
- Perhaps not (NCFC) - King, Feb 16, 19:59:17
- Look down the board, people were questioning the decision pre match. (n/m) (NCFC) - phrankin, Feb 16, 20:02:03
- I don't doubt it (NCFC) - King, Feb 16, 20:06:17
- The team today were not strong enough, LCFC played a very physical game... (NCFC) - wgf500, Feb 16, 20:10:34
- Indeed (NCFC) - King, Feb 16, 20:17:03
- Argh. I won't even begin to correct the SPAG in that (NCFC) - King, Feb 16, 20:19:00
- exaclty, the performance was god awful... (NCFC) - wgf500, Feb 16, 20:18:48
- Indeed (NCFC) - King, Feb 16, 20:17:03
- The team today were not strong enough, LCFC played a very physical game... (NCFC) - wgf500, Feb 16, 20:10:34
- I don't doubt it (NCFC) - King, Feb 16, 20:06:17
- Look down the board, people were questioning the decision pre match. (n/m) (NCFC) - phrankin, Feb 16, 20:02:03
- Perhaps not (NCFC) - King, Feb 16, 19:59:17
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.