Agree with you and EoH

I suppose the issue is whether we needed Gibbs right now in the first place, what with Bertrand, Hucks, Camara and Pattison all able to play on the left.

So we have put ourselves in this difficult position when there was no need to do so.

Posted By: duke of york on February 14th 2008 at 11:52:22

Message Thread

Hmmm. Roeder on Gibbs. (NCFC) - Tricky Hawes, Feb 13, 21:46:36
- it is a possibility (NCFC) - east of hampstead, Feb 14, 09:28:53
  - Yep, agree with that mostly (NCFC) - Tricky Hawes, Feb 14, 10:48:31
    - nail ... head (NCFC) - east of hampstead, Feb 14, 11:20:28
      - Yep, that's the risk, totally agree. (NCFC) - Tricky Hawes, Feb 14, 11:26:36
        
        Agree with you and EoH (NCFC) - duke of york, Feb 14, 11:52:22
        
        that's what I agree with (n/m) (NCFC) - Brandonio, Feb 14, 12:37:43
  - I'm in this side of the camp, and it's getting boring the Roeder criticism stuff (NCFC) - pants, Feb 14, 10:11:42
- Which is what I was saying last night (n/m) (NCFC) - duke of york, Feb 14, 00:00:26
- Thats 100% opposite of what I saw last night (NCFC) - KentonCanary, Feb 13, 22:50:26
- Never have played instead of Hucks. I worry GR has an agreement to play the loans maybe? (n/m) (NCFC) - Andyjzr, Feb 13, 21:48:32
  - Why would he bring them in if he didn't need to play them? (n/m) (NCFC) - tim berry, Feb 13, 22:50:39

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.