Thats 100% opposite of what I saw last night

Gibbs starved himself of the ball. Poor runs, didn't show for it, and generally looked like a rabbit being approached by a set of headlights.

I'd like to think that he is a better player than that, and I'm sure he'll improve (he couldn't be any worse) but I don't want him to get first team experience at our expense, which is what it looked like yesterday.

Posted By: KentonCanary on February 13th 2008 at 22:50:26

Message Thread

Hmmm. Roeder on Gibbs. (NCFC) - Tricky Hawes, Feb 13, 21:46:36
- it is a possibility (NCFC) - east of hampstead, Feb 14, 09:28:53
  - Yep, agree with that mostly (NCFC) - Tricky Hawes, Feb 14, 10:48:31
    - nail ... head (NCFC) - east of hampstead, Feb 14, 11:20:28
      - Yep, that's the risk, totally agree. (NCFC) - Tricky Hawes, Feb 14, 11:26:36
        
        Agree with you and EoH (NCFC) - duke of york, Feb 14, 11:52:22
        
        that's what I agree with (n/m) (NCFC) - Brandonio, Feb 14, 12:37:43
  - I'm in this side of the camp, and it's getting boring the Roeder criticism stuff (NCFC) - pants, Feb 14, 10:11:42
- Which is what I was saying last night (n/m) (NCFC) - duke of york, Feb 14, 00:00:26
- Thats 100% opposite of what I saw last night (NCFC) - KentonCanary, Feb 13, 22:50:26
- Never have played instead of Hucks. I worry GR has an agreement to play the loans maybe? (n/m) (NCFC) - Andyjzr, Feb 13, 21:48:32
  - Why would he bring them in if he didn't need to play them? (n/m) (NCFC) - tim berry, Feb 13, 22:50:39

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.