Yawn.
Sorry, I forgot. It's outrageous to feel emotional about the club I support, and express this emotion on an internet messageboard, isn't it? Only certain people are allowed to do that. Roeder's done brilliantly so far, amazingly in fact - but you know what gets me? If, perish the thought, we go down, there'll be a period of silence on here, in which anyone expressing anything other than despair will be told to f**k off - but within two or three days, almost certainly, the same old usual suspects will start b***hing about other posters being "negative" while stressing the need to move on and prepare for League 2.
It's pathetic. There's a small in crowd on here which seems to believe it can tell everyone else what to think or believe - but it can't.
Posted By: thebigfeller on January 16th 2008 at 10:37:37
Message Thread
- Hang on a minute (NCFC) - duke of york, Jan 16, 10:12:17
- What it reveals (NCFC) - Five guys named Creo, Jan 16, 10:31:48
- What a sensible post. (NCFC) - Tricky Hawes, Jan 16, 10:38:10
- Well quite. Measure the "disdain" by the lack of performance from our "big name" players (NCFC) - Arizona Bay, Jan 16, 10:30:24
- Does that mean though.. (NCFC) - Garry Brooke, Jan 16, 10:51:37
- Well, yes, rather shit. (NCFC) - Arizona Bay, Jan 16, 11:01:16
- Hux (NCFC) - Five guys named Creo, Jan 16, 10:32:49
- It wouldn't be a surprise, would it? (NCFC) - Arizona Bay, Jan 16, 10:39:07
- Do you doubt his commitment? (NCFC) - Five guys named Creo, Jan 16, 10:40:27
- No, not in the slightest. But my badly worded post certainly makes it look like I might. (NCFC) - Arizona Bay, Jan 16, 10:44:03
- Problem is everyone expects so much of him (NCFC) - duke of york, Jan 16, 10:43:52
- I still love him... (NCFC) - Fierce Panda, Jan 16, 10:48:48
- Scandalous and stupid (NCFC) - Five guys named Creo, Jan 16, 10:47:06
- Yeah, he doesn't look entirely fit (NCFC) - duke of york, Jan 16, 10:56:46
- Do you doubt his commitment? (NCFC) - Five guys named Creo, Jan 16, 10:40:27
- It wouldn't be a surprise, would it? (NCFC) - Arizona Bay, Jan 16, 10:39:07
- What's with the "disdain" word all of a sudden... (NCFC) - Fierce Panda, Jan 16, 10:32:48
- Rememberance of Helveg and Nielsen (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Jan 16, 10:39:56
- Does that mean though.. (NCFC) - Garry Brooke, Jan 16, 10:51:37
- I like walking. I'm really good at that. Have you sold your Lambretta yet? (n/m) (NCFC) - Fierce Panda, Jan 16, 10:28:27
- No we don't need to get a grip (NCFC) - Jim, Jan 16, 10:26:23
- you clearly do (NCFC) - megson, Jan 16, 10:35:45
- For years many people have said Hucks' best (NCFC) - duke of york, Jan 16, 10:29:59
- Nobody is saying the manager's a c*nt (NCFC) - Jim, Jan 16, 10:38:15
- you did deserve better than that. (NCFC) - megson, Jan 16, 10:40:01
- I'm quite used to dire away perfomances (NCFC) - Jim, Jan 16, 10:41:29
- which makes perfect sense. (NCFC) - megson, Jan 16, 10:44:58
- I'm quite used to dire away perfomances (NCFC) - Jim, Jan 16, 10:41:29
- haha - that's probably the first time I've ever said that (NCFC) - duke of york, Jan 16, 10:39:38
- you did deserve better than that. (NCFC) - megson, Jan 16, 10:40:01
- Nobody is saying the manager's a c*nt (NCFC) - Jim, Jan 16, 10:38:15
- "4-3-3 formation which has been shown time and time again lready this season not to work." (NCFC) - blindasabat, Jan 16, 10:29:27
- well said (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 16, 10:28:06
- Tony Gale must have had a bet on Bury (NCFC) - duke of york, Jan 16, 10:30:25
- One of the biggest downsides is the loss of momentum (NCFC) - Jim, Jan 16, 10:29:51
- or a reality check for our players that they just can't turn up and expect to win (NCFC) - blindasabat, Jan 16, 10:40:32
- How can there be a loss of momentum when by your own admission it was different personnel (NCFC) - Arizona Bay, Jan 16, 10:33:03
- Because he's a moaning twat (n/m) (NCFC) - duke of york, Jan 16, 10:38:27
- Yeah. Me, Jim, SCC, capecodcarman - we're all just moaning twats, aren't we? (NCFC) - thebigfeller, Jan 16, 10:47:21
- To be fair, your inclusion of SCC there does absolutely nothing to enhance your argument. (n/m) (NCFC) - Arizona Bay, Jan 16, 10:52:30
- *splutter* (n/m) (NCFC) - Old Git, Jan 16, 10:55:21
- To be fair, your inclusion of SCC there does absolutely nothing to enhance your argument. (n/m) (NCFC) - Arizona Bay, Jan 16, 10:52:30
- Because (NCFC) - Jim, Jan 16, 10:45:02
- But on Satdee they'll be playing ona decent pitch with Thanks Evans For Little Ched, and (NCFC) - Old Git, Jan 16, 10:57:55
- It wsn't a ploughed field last night. It was better, actually, than Barnsley on Saturday (NCFC) - Arizona Bay, Jan 16, 11:06:45
- I agree tiny would be a boost (NCFC) - megson, Jan 16, 11:00:35
- But on Satdee they'll be playing ona decent pitch with Thanks Evans For Little Ched, and (NCFC) - Old Git, Jan 16, 10:57:55
- Yeah. Me, Jim, SCC, capecodcarman - we're all just moaning twats, aren't we? (NCFC) - thebigfeller, Jan 16, 10:47:21
- Because he's a moaning twat (n/m) (NCFC) - duke of york, Jan 16, 10:38:27
- Innit (n/m) (NCFC) - Partial Angler, Jan 16, 10:25:45
- There's a small wake up call to everyone here too (NCFC) - pants, Jan 16, 10:17:46
- Agree entirely (NCFC) - duke of york, Jan 16, 10:20:39
- agreed. (n/m) (NCFC) - megson, Jan 16, 10:34:11
- Roeder has earnt it (NCFC) - pants, Jan 16, 10:21:59
- Crushing sense of despair (n/m) (NCFC) - duke of york, Jan 16, 10:23:15
- Yawn. (NCFC) - thebigfeller, Jan 16, 10:37:37
- ... (NCFC) - blindasabat, Jan 16, 10:43:10
- I don't - but each to their own, as PK might say (n/m) (NCFC) - thebigfeller, Jan 16, 10:43:59
- Are you getting all cross big chappy? If you are it really is not worth the effort... (NCFC) - Fierce Panda, Jan 16, 10:40:27
- LOL! There'll bn (n/m) (NCFC) - thebigfeller, Jan 16, 10:41:51
- be no blubbing, and no leaving (n/m) (NCFC) - thebigfeller, Jan 16, 10:42:30
- LOL! There'll bn (n/m) (NCFC) - thebigfeller, Jan 16, 10:41:51
- Yawn. Read about 5 words of that (n/m) (NCFC) - duke of york, Jan 16, 10:38:47
- What's the matter? Six lines too much for you now? (n/m) (NCFC) - thebigfeller, Jan 16, 10:40:07
- In this case, yes (n/m) (NCFC) - duke of york, Jan 16, 10:42:16
- What's the matter? Six lines too much for you now? (n/m) (NCFC) - thebigfeller, Jan 16, 10:40:07
- ... (NCFC) - blindasabat, Jan 16, 10:43:10
- Yawn. (NCFC) - thebigfeller, Jan 16, 10:37:37
- Crushing sense of despair (n/m) (NCFC) - duke of york, Jan 16, 10:23:15
- Agree entirely (NCFC) - duke of york, Jan 16, 10:20:39
- I think if you look at the table, we are better (NCFC) - XXL16, Jan 16, 10:14:13
- Agree entirely (NCFC) - Buckscanary, Jan 16, 10:18:27
- Also thee game against "wealthy" Leicester is (NCFC) - XXL16, Jan 16, 10:23:16
- I can't imagine the clubs finance bods will be that narked either (NCFC) - pants, Jan 16, 10:20:17
- 2 players!! (NCFC) - duke of york, Jan 16, 10:17:16
- Camara and Croft? (n/m) (n/m) (NCFC) - XXL16, Jan 16, 10:22:40
- Hucks was in for Croft (NCFC) - duke of york, Jan 16, 10:24:02
- over 25% of the starters (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 16, 10:27:01
- a bit of a worry that these are the guys to come in should a couple of injuries hit (n/m) (NCFC) - phrankin, Jan 16, 10:31:09
- over 25% of the starters (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 16, 10:27:01
- Hucks was in for Croft (NCFC) - duke of york, Jan 16, 10:24:02
- Camara and Croft? (n/m) (n/m) (NCFC) - XXL16, Jan 16, 10:22:40
- Agree entirely (NCFC) - Buckscanary, Jan 16, 10:18:27
- What it reveals (NCFC) - Five guys named Creo, Jan 16, 10:31:48
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.