I'm sorry, why do we NEED an "ex-Premiership" manager?
because our fans demand one (because Sky say the Prem is everything presumably). I can't think of any emplyed ones we could get, so I would have to ask why are such managers not in a job now?
I think Jewell would be a good choice because he is a good manager (the Prem bit is irrelevant - by your argument Bradford shouldn't have appointed him when they did).
Posted By: mr carra on October 15th 2007 at 09:39:28
Message Thread
- The Board are clearly f***ed on this one (NCFC) - mr carra, Oct 15, 09:05:13
- In all fairness thats bollox (NCFC) - BINMEN8R, Oct 15, 09:20:25
- but I can easily imagine loads of people arguing against all of those if we appoint them (NCFC) - mr carra, Oct 15, 09:26:30
- I actually agree with that (n/m) (NCFC) - BINMEN8R, Oct 15, 09:52:51
- but I can easily imagine loads of people arguing against all of those if we appoint them (NCFC) - mr carra, Oct 15, 09:26:30
- You make a fair point, but... (NCFC) - Partial Angler, Oct 15, 09:10:57
- Pulis would be the third consecutive (NCFC) - duke of york, Oct 15, 09:13:10
- I'd Actually Prefer Duffy To Pulis (NCFC) - Martin Peters, Oct 15, 09:30:35
- Spot on! (NCFC) - Highlander, Oct 15, 09:27:17
- I'm sorry, why do we NEED an "ex-Premiership" manager? (NCFC) - mr carra, Oct 15, 09:39:28
- Pulis would be the third consecutive (NCFC) - duke of york, Oct 15, 09:13:10
- I agree. Some fans would be upset even if we would appoint Lippi or Capello (n/m) (NCFC) - francesco, Oct 15, 09:08:15
- In all fairness thats bollox (NCFC) - BINMEN8R, Oct 15, 09:20:25
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.