but I can easily imagine loads of people arguing against all of those if we appoint them
with the possible exception of Jewell.
Penney and Driscoll, while I agree they look pretty decent managers, are hardly household names and would sadly bring the "little old Norwich" whingers (and they are one of the more common types of whinger) out in force moaning at an unambitious choice.
Posted By: mr carra on October 15th 2007 at 09:26:30
Message Thread
- The Board are clearly f***ed on this one (NCFC) - mr carra, Oct 15, 09:05:13
- In all fairness thats bollox (NCFC) - BINMEN8R, Oct 15, 09:20:25
- but I can easily imagine loads of people arguing against all of those if we appoint them (NCFC) - mr carra, Oct 15, 09:26:30
- I actually agree with that (n/m) (NCFC) - BINMEN8R, Oct 15, 09:52:51
- but I can easily imagine loads of people arguing against all of those if we appoint them (NCFC) - mr carra, Oct 15, 09:26:30
- You make a fair point, but... (NCFC) - Partial Angler, Oct 15, 09:10:57
- Pulis would be the third consecutive (NCFC) - duke of york, Oct 15, 09:13:10
- I'd Actually Prefer Duffy To Pulis (NCFC) - Martin Peters, Oct 15, 09:30:35
- Spot on! (NCFC) - Highlander, Oct 15, 09:27:17
- I'm sorry, why do we NEED an "ex-Premiership" manager? (NCFC) - mr carra, Oct 15, 09:39:28
- Pulis would be the third consecutive (NCFC) - duke of york, Oct 15, 09:13:10
- I agree. Some fans would be upset even if we would appoint Lippi or Capello (n/m) (NCFC) - francesco, Oct 15, 09:08:15
- In all fairness thats bollox (NCFC) - BINMEN8R, Oct 15, 09:20:25
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.