blah

I fail to see how the board vetoing signings (which you just suggested) isn't letting non footballing people take control of footballing matters? Why shouldn't the board veto signings? Because they are there for the business side of things and not the footballing side of things. The board set the transfer fees, and the wage caps and the manager decides who to bring in accordingly. I'm convinced that's how it was and I'm convinced that's the way it should be. All Worthington ever did was spend the money that was allotted to him by the board. Granted, he spunked it all on trash but I still think we either had to back him, or sack him. The only thing they've really done wrong is having infinite patience with him when they should have been more ruthless

Posted By: scruffy on January 14th 2007 at 17:17:30

Message Thread

It's the board's fault (NCFC) - Kelly Monteith, Jan 14, 13:03:01
- So, to summerise: (NCFC) - scruffy, Jan 14, 13:27:45
  - That isn't what I said is it? (NCFC) - Kelly Monteith, Jan 14, 13:40:05
    - well (NCFC) - scruffy, Jan 14, 15:27:19
      - It isn't what I said (NCFC) - Kelly Monteith, Jan 14, 16:48:47
        
        blah (NCFC) - scruffy, Jan 14, 17:17:30
        
        Not really (NCFC) - Kelly Monteith, Jan 14, 17:26:46
        
        IMHO the only option there is to sack him though (NCFC) - scruffy, Jan 14, 18:14:05
        
        Fair point (NCFC) - Kelly Monteith, Jan 14, 18:27:17
- I totally agree (NCFC) - Daryl Hutch, Jan 14, 13:14:39

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.