That's the same way you've looked at it in your last 47 posts.
At least two of which I read. Those two statements aren't incompatible, when you take into consideration when they were made and what has happened since.
Posted By: Mastiff on December 1st 2006 at 17:12:38
Message Thread
- And again (NCFC) - Old Git, Dec 1, 16:20:09
- How much were we in debt before we went up? (n/m) (NCFC) - Small, Dec 1, 16:43:15
- Is 9 million the wage bill for everyone? (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Dec 1, 16:35:39
- Just Peter Thorne, I think. (NCFC) - Arizona Bay, Dec 1, 16:39:09
- Peter Thorne Peter Thorne Peter Thorne Peter Thorne Peter Thorne (NCFC) - pants, Dec 1, 16:48:59
- ha ha. Not far from the truth, I'd guess. (NCFC) - Tricky Hawes, Dec 1, 16:41:09
- Whatever way you slice this (NCFC) - Old Git, Dec 1, 16:47:39
- Just Peter Thorne, I think. (NCFC) - Arizona Bay, Dec 1, 16:39:09
- Staged pay reductions (NCFC) - hod80, Dec 1, 16:33:06
- Actually this is all pretty consistent, isn't it? (NCFC) - Tricky Hawes, Dec 1, 16:27:51
- I'm sorry? (NCFC) - Old Git, Dec 1, 16:30:06
- I think the implication of this is pretty clear: (NCFC) - Tricky Hawes, Dec 1, 16:35:41
- "are more contradictory" (NCFC) - Old Git, Dec 1, 16:38:11
- for what it's worth... (NCFC) - Tricky Hawes, Dec 1, 16:40:28
- So then the position would be this (NCFC) - Old Git, Dec 1, 16:45:33
- Yup, about right. (NCFC) - Tricky Hawes, Dec 1, 16:48:47
- You may not have noticed Tricky, but (NCFC) - Old Git, Dec 1, 16:52:39
- My memory of first team when we went down was: (NCFC) - Tricky Hawes, Dec 1, 17:07:13
- Wrong, actually (NCFC) - Old Git, Dec 1, 17:20:59
- Yeah, your right there, even I'm running out now!! (NCFC) - Infinite Patience, Dec 1, 17:42:47
- Wouldn't describe Francis as 'shipped out'. (n/m) (NCFC) - Mastiff, Dec 1, 17:39:44
- True, but he still went doidnt he??? SO off our wage bill yeah??? (n/m) (NCFC) - Infinite Patience, Dec 1, 17:43:39
- Wrong, actually (NCFC) - Old Git, Dec 1, 17:20:59
- This really bothers you doesn't it? (n/m) (NCFC) - Mastiff, Dec 1, 16:55:21
- Well, not hoogely (NCFC) - Old Git, Dec 1, 16:57:22
- What's the current infatuation with spin? (n/m) (NCFC) - Mastiff, Dec 1, 16:58:36
- rest of message... (NCFC) - Mastiff, Dec 1, 17:01:39
- Well, look at this way (NCFC) - Old Git, Dec 1, 17:05:22
- That's the same way you've looked at it in your last 47 posts. (NCFC) - Mastiff, Dec 1, 17:12:38
- Hey, you asked the question buddy (n/m) (NCFC) - Old Git, Dec 1, 17:21:59
- That's the same way you've looked at it in your last 47 posts. (NCFC) - Mastiff, Dec 1, 17:12:38
- Well, look at this way (NCFC) - Old Git, Dec 1, 17:05:22
- rest of message... (NCFC) - Mastiff, Dec 1, 17:01:39
- What's the current infatuation with spin? (n/m) (NCFC) - Mastiff, Dec 1, 16:58:36
- Well, not hoogely (NCFC) - Old Git, Dec 1, 16:57:22
- My memory of first team when we went down was: (NCFC) - Tricky Hawes, Dec 1, 17:07:13
- You may not have noticed Tricky, but (NCFC) - Old Git, Dec 1, 16:52:39
- Yup, about right. (NCFC) - Tricky Hawes, Dec 1, 16:48:47
- I'd go along with that (NCFC) - megson, Dec 1, 16:45:17
- So then the position would be this (NCFC) - Old Git, Dec 1, 16:45:33
- for what it's worth... (NCFC) - Tricky Hawes, Dec 1, 16:40:28
- "are more contradictory" (NCFC) - Old Git, Dec 1, 16:38:11
- devils advocate (NCFC) - megson, Dec 1, 16:31:36
- No no no (NCFC) - Old Git, Dec 1, 16:34:24
- which i don't disagree with at all (NCFC) - megson, Dec 1, 16:36:02
- Did they? (NCFC) - Old Git, Dec 1, 16:41:39
- what about Earnie though... (NCFC) - blindasabat, Dec 1, 16:47:15
- very good point (NCFC) - megson, Dec 1, 16:49:14
- i'd say we were also on our knees before little Earn when we signed him too (NCFC) - blindasabat, Dec 1, 16:57:16
- dammit I wanted to do the eye to eye joke!" (NCFC) - megson, Dec 1, 17:00:48
- Strue (NCFC) - Old Git, Dec 1, 16:55:21
- Bobins and Croft are the only 2 that dropped a division to come here (NCFC) - blindasabat, Dec 1, 17:07:26
- I fear we may be paying close to that.... (NCFC) - megson, Dec 1, 17:00:22
- i'd say we were also on our knees before little Earn when we signed him too (NCFC) - blindasabat, Dec 1, 16:57:16
- very good point (NCFC) - megson, Dec 1, 16:49:14
- yes but wages wise (NCFC) - megson, Dec 1, 16:47:05
- what about Earnie though... (NCFC) - blindasabat, Dec 1, 16:47:15
- Did they? (NCFC) - Old Git, Dec 1, 16:41:39
- which i don't disagree with at all (NCFC) - megson, Dec 1, 16:36:02
- No no no (NCFC) - Old Git, Dec 1, 16:34:24
- fight fight fight (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 26, Dec 1, 16:30:43
- I think the implication of this is pretty clear: (NCFC) - Tricky Hawes, Dec 1, 16:35:41
- I'm sorry? (NCFC) - Old Git, Dec 1, 16:30:06
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.