The most incisive parts of that post were...

"...I can't prove this, and it might well just be a load of hot air"

and

"This is just a theory, and is almost certainly nonsense.."

Surely it couldn't be, could it? No. What would be the board's motive for lying when it said 'Nigel worthington is on a one-year rolling contract'. Sacking him was always going to be expensive, whenever it was done and under whatever contract.

Posted By: Mastiff on December 1st 2006 at 17:06:56


Message Thread


Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.

Log in