And gives every team down to about 16th with 10 games left a chance
Posted By: jamesward on March 5th 2026 at 11:40:05
Message Thread
- Expanded play-offs from next season confirmed (n/m) (NCFC) - Klobo04, Mar 5, 11:15:01
- 3rd and 4th teams now have a bigger edge than before. (n/m) (NCFC) - usacanary, Mar 5, 12:39:09
- Ww2 but yes (NCFC) - SCC 28, Mar 5, 12:49:28
- Or they don't, because they have a longer gap between competitive fixtures. (n/m) (NCFC) - norwaay, Mar 5, 12:41:43
- A loss of rhythm can definitely be factor (NCFC) - norwaay, Mar 5, 12:57:21
- Pulled out of your arse.....yet we vast amounts of data on playing off rest. (n/m) (NCFC) - usacanary, Mar 5, 18:05:35
- No, I think they definitely do (NCFC) - Old Git, Mar 5, 12:43:53
- They absolutely do. (NCFC) - usacanary, Mar 5, 18:09:44
- A loss of rhythm can definitely be factor (NCFC) - norwaay, Mar 5, 12:57:21
- Not sure what I think (NCFC) - Basil Wrathbone, Mar 5, 12:01:59
- We're actually the poster boys for this aren't we? (NCFC) - norwaay, Mar 5, 11:58:09
- Yeah but we don’t deserve the playoffs due to the start. (n/m) (NCFC) - Legacy Fan, Mar 5, 12:02:00
- btw, my contribution to Tombs thread yesterday, was just that (NCFC) - Lentil Weaver, Mar 5, 12:16:10
- its the total number of points over 46 games that count (NCFC) - ghostof barry butler, Mar 5, 12:05:28
- Beautifully put (NCFC) - SCC 28, Mar 5, 12:01:54
- It was Cov in 85 (NCFC) - norwaay, Mar 5, 12:07:11
- Although, yes - they did play Everton who were already champions (n/m) (NCFC) - norwaay, Mar 5, 12:08:23
- Ah yes of course (NCFC) - SCC 28, Mar 5, 12:10:03
- Although, yes - they did play Everton who were already champions (n/m) (NCFC) - norwaay, Mar 5, 12:08:23
- It was Cov in 85 (NCFC) - norwaay, Mar 5, 12:07:11
- And Sheffield United (NCFC) - jamesward, Mar 5, 11:59:04
- Yeah but we don’t deserve the playoffs due to the start. (n/m) (NCFC) - Legacy Fan, Mar 5, 12:02:00
- Booo (NCFC) - Charles21, Mar 5, 11:44:24
- Yep how dare they make it better (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Mar 5, 11:47:19
- plainly a shit idea (n/m) (NCFC) - paulg, Mar 5, 11:39:12
- £££ (n/m) (NCFC) - Old Git, Mar 5, 11:42:38
- In the end your view on it presumably comes down to (NCFC) - Tricky Hawes, Mar 5, 11:48:12
- I attach a good deal of weight (NCFC) - paulg, Mar 5, 11:53:35
- The best 2 teams not getting autos are now rewarded (NCFC) - SCC 28, Mar 5, 11:57:29
- More misguided I’d say (NCFC) - SCC 28, Mar 5, 11:51:13
- I think everyone can agree that it reduces fairness (NCFC) - norwaay, Mar 5, 11:51:06
- Yes (NCFC) - SCC 28, Mar 5, 11:53:54
- I'd actually prefer back to top 3 (n/m) (NCFC) - Legacy Fan, Mar 5, 12:17:01
- I can live with the current system (NCFC) - paulg, Mar 5, 13:08:08
- I’m sure you’re not alone (NCFC) - SCC 28, Mar 5, 12:20:30
- I'd actually prefer back to top 3 (n/m) (NCFC) - Legacy Fan, Mar 5, 12:17:01
- Yes (NCFC) - SCC 28, Mar 5, 11:53:54
- I attach a good deal of weight (NCFC) - paulg, Mar 5, 11:53:35
- And entertainment (NCFC) - SCC 28, Mar 5, 11:46:12
- In the end your view on it presumably comes down to (NCFC) - Tricky Hawes, Mar 5, 11:48:12
- £££ (n/m) (NCFC) - Old Git, Mar 5, 11:42:38
- Sorry to be thick but how does that work? (n/m) (NCFC) - Old Git, Mar 5, 11:37:48
- 5th to 8th in first round, two of them go through to face 3rd and 4th. (n/m) (NCFC) - norwaay, Mar 5, 11:39:57
- No thanks, made me wait far too long for my free information which I could have googled (n/m) (NCFC) - Old Git, Mar 5, 11:42:18
- WW2 (n/m) (NCFC) - jamesward, Mar 5, 11:41:29
- But pithier (n/m) (NCFC) - norwaay, Mar 5, 11:42:48
- You used one more word (NCFC) - jamesward, Mar 5, 11:44:31
- But pithier (n/m) (NCFC) - norwaay, Mar 5, 11:42:48
- ... (NCFC) - Henclrikus, Mar 5, 11:39:33
- Also thanks but too many words (n/m) (NCFC) - Old Git, Mar 5, 11:41:26
- It’s the best explanation as shows 1 off game first round (NCFC) - SCC 28, Mar 5, 11:43:41
- Also thanks but too many words (n/m) (NCFC) - Old Git, Mar 5, 11:41:26
- 3rd and 4th straight to semis (NCFC) - jamesward, Mar 5, 11:39:24
- 5th to 8th in first round, two of them go through to face 3rd and 4th. (n/m) (NCFC) - norwaay, Mar 5, 11:39:57
- GTFI (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Mar 5, 11:36:49
- Current 8th 15 points behind third if scum win their game in hand (NCFC) - jamesward, Mar 5, 11:27:21
- It's copying the NBA "play-in" then is it? Not sure i like it (n/m) (NCFC) - trafford_canary, Mar 5, 11:16:33
- NFL post-season isn't dissimilar (NCFC) - CWC, Mar 5, 12:51:45
- I wouldn't like it if I came 3rd by a mile and lost to a team that scraped in to 8th (NCFC) - norwaay, Mar 5, 11:38:59
- I wouldn't like it (NCFC) - jamesward, Mar 5, 12:57:10
- If he absolutely fuming (NCFC) - SCC 28, Mar 5, 11:41:26
- Absolutely made for Wolves next season (NCFC) - norwaay, Mar 5, 11:43:48
- Maybe Spurs I mean! (n/m) (NCFC) - norwaay, Mar 5, 11:44:01
- Or Leeds, who could fail in the play offs in a whole new way (n/m) (NCFC) - jamesward, Mar 5, 11:45:37
- Maybe Spurs I mean! (n/m) (NCFC) - norwaay, Mar 5, 11:44:01
- I’d be (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Mar 5, 11:41:46
- Absolutely made for Wolves next season (NCFC) - norwaay, Mar 5, 11:43:48
- And gives every team down to about 16th with 10 games left a chance (n/m) (NCFC) - jamesward, Mar 5, 11:40:05
- We could still finish 8th and would probs go in as one of the favourites (n/m) (NCFC) - norwaay, Mar 5, 11:41:57
- Yep, only 6 points off (n/m) (NCFC) - jamesward, Mar 5, 11:43:04
- We could still finish 8th and would probs go in as one of the favourites (n/m) (NCFC) - norwaay, Mar 5, 11:41:57
- Non league has very similar (NCFC) - SCC 28, Mar 5, 11:37:32
- It's all fun and games until you have to play in the Prem the next season. (n/m) (NCFC) - trafford_canary, Mar 5, 13:09:05
- 3rd and 4th teams now have a bigger edge than before. (n/m) (NCFC) - usacanary, Mar 5, 12:39:09
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.