0.89 on Fotmob
I’d probably make it 0.66 tbh
Posted By: SCC 28 on November 3rd 2025 at 10:31:17
Message Thread
- Sargent's chance in fifth minute worth 0.93xG (NCFC) - Kangol Canary, Nov 3, 10:23:22
- Xg (NCFC) - Nelsons final flanel, Nov 3, 11:15:28
- Sargent scores that last season, his confidence is shit AND he isn’t given… (NCFC) - Kentish Canary, Nov 3, 10:53:16
- If xG is so subjective maybe it should be scrapped until something more reliable is found (n/m) (NCFC) - footymadman, Nov 3, 10:48:53
- 0.89 on Fotmob (NCFC) - SCC 28, Nov 3, 10:31:17
- 0.93, 0.89, 0.66.....do we have any other offers? (NCFC) - usacanary, Nov 3, 15:45:33
- So its subjective based on an individuals opinion.... (NCFC) - usacanary, Nov 3, 12:59:06
- No they use complex scientific models (NCFC) - SCC 28, Nov 3, 13:14:05
- Ironic.....I have PhD and MSc in an actual scientific subject..... (NCFC) - usacanary, Nov 3, 15:43:57
- Too complex for you I’m afraid (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Nov 3, 18:04:02
- So complex that 3 people cant agree including yourself.... (NCFC) - usacanary, Nov 3, 15:40:55
- Companies like Opta, Stasbomb, Wyscout, etc have the own proprietary models, however the (NCFC) - The Gaffer, Nov 3, 15:50:49
- Yes but how useful is xG..... (NCFC) - usacanary, Nov 3, 15:59:04
- xG doesn't predict outcomes but when used with other statistics/metrics it can be an (NCFC) - The Gaffer, Nov 3, 19:47:16
- Yes but how useful is xG..... (NCFC) - usacanary, Nov 3, 15:59:04
- Companies like Opta, Stasbomb, Wyscout, etc have the own proprietary models, however the (NCFC) - The Gaffer, Nov 3, 15:50:49
- Ironic.....I have PhD and MSc in an actual scientific subject..... (NCFC) - usacanary, Nov 3, 15:43:57
- No they use complex scientific models (NCFC) - SCC 28, Nov 3, 13:14:05
- In real time it looked like he was really stretching for it (n/m) (NCFC) - jamesward, Nov 3, 10:40:17
- It was right in front of me and it never looked like being a goal (NCFC) - mr carra, Nov 3, 10:53:28
- Yep, no-one in the lower Barclay near me even moaned about him missing it (n/m) (NCFC) - jamesward, Nov 3, 10:55:26
- It’s a deceptive view in the stands (NCFC) - SCC 28, Nov 3, 12:27:55
- So xG depends on the angle its viewed from.....glad we cleared that up.... (n/m) (NCFC) - usacanary, Nov 3, 15:49:04
- Just watched it, and disagree (NCFC) - jamesward, Nov 3, 13:31:08
- It’s a deceptive view in the stands (NCFC) - SCC 28, Nov 3, 12:27:55
- Yep, no-one in the lower Barclay near me even moaned about him missing it (n/m) (NCFC) - jamesward, Nov 3, 10:55:26
- It was right in front of me and it never looked like being a goal (NCFC) - mr carra, Nov 3, 10:53:28
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.