The MAJOR problem with xG.....

a human has to judge the quality of the chance.

Which means multiple humans are watching multiple games.

I have seen stats on a game where it says 0 shots on target in the first half when I watched the keeper make two saves....

Posted By: usacanary on November 5th 2022 at 17:23:13

Message Thread

Phew (NCFC) - SCC 28, Nov 5, 17:04:33
- So which has a higher Correlation (NCFC) - usacanary, Nov 5, 17:07:39
  - xG by far (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Nov 5, 17:09:08
    - I’d have thought the xg table matches the league table closely (NCFC) - SimonOTBC, Nov 5, 17:11:17
      - Mostly but professional dont use xG to make betting predictions. (NCFC) - usacanary, Nov 5, 17:14:30
      - Yeah champ this season has some crazy outliers though (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Nov 5, 17:13:40
        
        I will bet you PPG of the first half of the season has..... (NCFC) - usacanary, Nov 5, 17:18:14
        
        Would doubt that very much (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Nov 5, 17:24:06
        
        Well you would be wrong. (n/m) (NCFC) - usacanary, Nov 5, 17:34:02
        
        Very much doubt that (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Nov 5, 17:37:21
        
        You are like one of these internet medical experts...... (NCFC) - usacanary, Nov 5, 17:40:11
        
        In shockling news... better strikers take their chances more often. (n/m) (NCFC) - usacanary, Nov 5, 17:15:29
        
        WBA have shit strikers? (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Nov 5, 17:18:18
        
        Well clearly or playing shit. (NCFC) - usacanary, Nov 5, 17:19:53
        
        Or they generally go behind in games (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, Nov 5, 17:38:52
        
        And it also takes into account what the oppo do (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Nov 5, 17:18:36
        
        WBA are second in the xG table.... (NCFC) - usacanary, Nov 5, 17:20:43
        
        The MAJOR problem with xG..... (NCFC) - usacanary, Nov 5, 17:23:13
        
        yep, the companies who take predictions seriously (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, Nov 5, 17:27:00
        
        Pretty much spot on. (NCFC) - usacanary, Nov 5, 17:31:27
        
        Early days… (NCFC) - SimonOTBC, Nov 5, 17:15:11
        
        we are getting towards the half way point. (n/m) (NCFC) - usacanary, Nov 5, 17:16:46
- XG is bollocks today (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, Nov 5, 17:06:03
  - Why would it count the 2v1? (NCFC) - SCC 28, Nov 5, 17:07:26
    - it wouldn't because XG is a bit shit (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, Nov 5, 17:09:33
      - Don’t be silly (NCFC) - SimonOTBC, Nov 5, 17:12:16
        
        Yeah it has to be counted at a consistent point (NCFC) - SCC 28, Nov 5, 17:17:44
        
        the fact is though, that the companies that use expected goals (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, Nov 5, 17:21:22
        
        It's not silly - the true XG developed by companies like Smartodds (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, Nov 5, 17:15:49
        
        Yeah 1% chance ooooh (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Nov 5, 17:19:25
        
        not sure what you mean (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, Nov 5, 17:22:51

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.