Russia have lots of soldiers but their weaponry is rubbish
If NATO wanted to get involved they’d wipe the floor with Russia.
The Russians cant compete in modern war and their bullying capability is limited, it would be ineffective against NATO’s air power which is easily deployed from distance, though I’d expect more NATO allocation of forces near Russia soon.
Posted By: Tony Martin on February 25th 2022 at 10:44:33
Message Thread
- Those poor Ukrainians … (General Chat) - loz, Feb 25, 07:35:11
- Crazy times. The Ukrainians are doing a good job of holding them up (General Chat) - Tony Martin, Feb 25, 10:34:26
- russia has weapons stationed in serbia .... (General Chat) - paulg, Feb 25, 10:39:29
- This has been building up for many years. The first western “crack” came with Iraq… (General Chat) - Ruttles, Feb 25, 09:16:08
- How we meekly left Afghanistan anything to do with it? (General Chat) - NorskyNormann, Feb 25, 09:47:15
- Exactly. We left Afghanistan for political gains at home and chaos ensued… (General Chat) - Ruttles, Feb 25, 10:10:03
- 😔 (n/m) (General Chat) - NorskyNormann, Feb 25, 12:02:47
- Exactly. We left Afghanistan for political gains at home and chaos ensued… (General Chat) - Ruttles, Feb 25, 10:10:03
- How we meekly left Afghanistan anything to do with it? (General Chat) - NorskyNormann, Feb 25, 09:47:15
- We should have thought about that 10 years ago (General Chat) - paulg, Feb 25, 08:00:24
- Decades of under investment in armed forces (General Chat) - Old Git, Feb 25, 08:26:30
- Respectfully, I utterly disagree (General Chat) - Cardiff Canary, Feb 25, 09:48:50
- It's not a failure of politics/diplomacy (except in the very broadest sense) (General Chat) - paulg, Feb 25, 17:14:56
- Russia have lots of soldiers but their weaponry is rubbish (General Chat) - Tony Martin, Feb 25, 10:44:33
- 2022 warfare is looking disturbingly similar to 1939 warfare at the mo (General Chat) - paulg, Feb 25, 10:16:38
- How much extra weaponry (of ours) would have stopped it? (General Chat) - Cardiff Canary, Feb 25, 10:39:46
- Ultimately we both have nukes. The problem as I see it is who would actually use them tho (n/m) (General Chat) - NorskyNormann, Feb 25, 14:46:07
- Because Ukraine ditched their nukes in 1994 (General Chat) - jamesward, Feb 25, 10:19:04
- Hurrah! You're very welcome to the party! :) (n/m) (General Chat) - paulg, Feb 25, 10:25:53
- How much extra weaponry (of ours) would have stopped it? (General Chat) - Cardiff Canary, Feb 25, 10:39:46
- Might knock a few points off the Scottish Nats I spose (General Chat) - paulg, Feb 25, 09:01:32
- Ha, silver linings (General Chat) - Old Git, Feb 25, 09:09:30
- That, plus (General Chat) - paulg, Feb 25, 08:51:35
- Yup. I try not to think about it these days as its too depressing (General Chat) - Under soil heating, Feb 25, 09:06:41
- Your first two paragraphs (General Chat) - APB, Feb 25, 09:13:03
- Totes. In fact, this is probably true pretty much everywhere. (n/m) (General Chat) - Under soil heating, Feb 25, 09:27:15
- Your first two paragraphs (General Chat) - APB, Feb 25, 09:13:03
- He also wanted destabilisation in the west (General Chat) - NorskyNormann, Feb 25, 08:53:30
- Tell that to stronger together Germany and Italy who (General Chat) - Captain Bligh, Feb 25, 08:55:47
- Back to the dirty Russian money reliance and gas supplies etc (General Chat) - NorskyNormann, Feb 25, 09:09:28
- Tell that to stronger together Germany and Italy who (General Chat) - Captain Bligh, Feb 25, 08:55:47
- Yup. I try not to think about it these days as its too depressing (General Chat) - Under soil heating, Feb 25, 09:06:41
- Totally irrelevant (as well as obviously debatable) (General Chat) - mr carra, Feb 25, 08:45:08
- The coalition in 2010 cut defence spending by one third (General Chat) - Old Git, Feb 25, 09:07:45
- Yes, he thinks we're a bit pathetic basically (General Chat) - paulg, Feb 25, 09:18:58
- more interested in turning europe into a big shopping mall, (General Chat) - ghostof barry butler, Feb 25, 09:25:22
- Yes, he thinks we're a bit pathetic basically (General Chat) - paulg, Feb 25, 09:18:58
- The coalition in 2010 cut defence spending by one third (General Chat) - Old Git, Feb 25, 09:07:45
- Respectfully, I utterly disagree (General Chat) - Cardiff Canary, Feb 25, 09:48:50
- and heavily reliant on dirty Russian money (n/m) (General Chat) - NorskyNormann, Feb 25, 08:05:52
- Decades of under investment in armed forces (General Chat) - Old Git, Feb 25, 08:26:30
- They will (General Chat) - Ken Dodds Dads Dog, Feb 25, 07:45:58
- We won’t engage them directly militarily because it will end in mutual destruction (n/m) (General Chat) - IG88, Feb 25, 07:54:50
- This. NATO boots on Ukrainian soil = WWIII (n/m) (General Chat) - norwaay, Feb 25, 08:45:43
- I hope you are joking, nobody "loves a war" (n/m) (General Chat) - Basingstoke_Canary, Feb 25, 07:49:15
- Arms dealers do (n/m) (General Chat) - Ken Dodds Dads Dog, Feb 25, 08:03:58
- We won’t engage them directly militarily because it will end in mutual destruction (n/m) (General Chat) - IG88, Feb 25, 07:54:50
- The west has lost its way (n/m) (General Chat) - shoddy, Feb 25, 07:40:44
- Crazy times. The Ukrainians are doing a good job of holding them up (General Chat) - Tony Martin, Feb 25, 10:34:26
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.