Well yeah, but that doesn’t explain 15 different winners since 2017
I don’t think many of those 12 one-time winners immediately took time out to have children.
Posted By: jampersands on September 12th 2021 at 20:24:52
Message Thread
- The other day I asked a qn about womens tennis volatility vs the mens game (Other Sports) - jampersands, Sep 12, 18:24:27
- here's a good one (Other Sports) - matt in london, Sep 12, 18:28:52
- ha. lost decade of men’s tennis players basically (n/m) (Other Sports) - jampersands, Sep 12, 18:39:03
- That and Fed etc didn’t have to take career breaks for pregnancy (Other Sports) - CWC, Sep 12, 18:42:48
- Well yeah, but that doesn’t explain 15 different winners since 2017 (Other Sports) - jampersands, Sep 12, 20:24:52
- Just no outstanding two or three players, with Serena on way down (Other Sports) - jamesward, Sep 12, 20:56:03
- And players come through (Other Sports) - SCC 28, Sep 12, 21:03:53
- Just no outstanding two or three players, with Serena on way down (Other Sports) - jamesward, Sep 12, 20:56:03
- Yep (n/m) (Other Sports) - SCC 28, Sep 12, 19:29:30
- Well yeah, but that doesn’t explain 15 different winners since 2017 (Other Sports) - jampersands, Sep 12, 20:24:52
- Thanks to 3 legends hoovering everything up (Other Sports) - SCC 28, Sep 12, 18:40:44
- That and Fed etc didn’t have to take career breaks for pregnancy (Other Sports) - CWC, Sep 12, 18:42:48
- ha. lost decade of men’s tennis players basically (n/m) (Other Sports) - jampersands, Sep 12, 18:39:03
- here's a good one (Other Sports) - matt in london, Sep 12, 18:28:52
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.