That and Fed etc didn’t have to take career breaks for pregnancy
That’s partly why there has been more variety at the top of the women’s game (and shorter careers).
Posted By: CWC on September 12th 2021 at 18:42:48
Message Thread
- The other day I asked a qn about womens tennis volatility vs the mens game (Other Sports) - jampersands, Sep 12, 18:24:27
- here's a good one (Other Sports) - matt in london, Sep 12, 18:28:52
- ha. lost decade of men’s tennis players basically (n/m) (Other Sports) - jampersands, Sep 12, 18:39:03
- That and Fed etc didn’t have to take career breaks for pregnancy (Other Sports) - CWC, Sep 12, 18:42:48
- Well yeah, but that doesn’t explain 15 different winners since 2017 (Other Sports) - jampersands, Sep 12, 20:24:52
- Just no outstanding two or three players, with Serena on way down (Other Sports) - jamesward, Sep 12, 20:56:03
- And players come through (Other Sports) - SCC 28, Sep 12, 21:03:53
- Just no outstanding two or three players, with Serena on way down (Other Sports) - jamesward, Sep 12, 20:56:03
- Yep (n/m) (Other Sports) - SCC 28, Sep 12, 19:29:30
- Well yeah, but that doesn’t explain 15 different winners since 2017 (Other Sports) - jampersands, Sep 12, 20:24:52
- Thanks to 3 legends hoovering everything up (Other Sports) - SCC 28, Sep 12, 18:40:44
- That and Fed etc didn’t have to take career breaks for pregnancy (Other Sports) - CWC, Sep 12, 18:42:48
- ha. lost decade of men’s tennis players basically (n/m) (Other Sports) - jampersands, Sep 12, 18:39:03
- here's a good one (Other Sports) - matt in london, Sep 12, 18:28:52
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.