Respectfully diisagree
If your referring to the pelanty, that was a foul- no judgement required
X
Posted By: Nelsons final flanel on September 11th 2021 at 21:10:20
Message Thread
- Offside laws (NCFC) - Under soil heating, Sep 11, 18:37:20
- Truth is (NCFC) - Nelsons final flanel, Sep 11, 19:42:52
- VAR is supposed to take the judgment out of it (n/m) (NCFC) - Jim, Sep 11, 20:48:55
- It can’t unless the laws change too though X (n/m) (NCFC) - Nelsons final flanel, Sep 11, 21:11:17
- Last game a judgement went for us (NCFC) - SCC 28, Sep 11, 19:47:14
- Respectfully diisagree (NCFC) - Nelsons final flanel, Sep 11, 21:10:20
- VAR is supposed to take the judgment out of it (n/m) (NCFC) - Jim, Sep 11, 20:48:55
- Offside? (NCFC) - Eric Morecambe, Sep 11, 19:25:35
- Offside? 2 (NCFC) - Eric Morecambe, Sep 11, 19:27:29
- Best way is to educate yourself on the laws (NCFC) - SCC 28, Sep 11, 18:41:34
- big issue is ref decides who is "interfering with play" (NCFC) - Farkeball, Sep 11, 19:36:30
- A player who ultimately scores is clearly interfering with play. (n/m) (NCFC) - Jim, Sep 11, 20:50:12
- Nope the ref has to implement the laws of the game (NCFC) - SCC 28, Sep 11, 19:41:29
- its the ref who decides of someone is interfering (NCFC) - Farkeball, Sep 11, 19:59:49
- Link us up then big boy (NCFC) - ghostof barry butler, Sep 11, 18:47:47
- The McLean ‘goal’ done to death (NCFC) - SCC 28, Sep 11, 18:49:15
- big issue is ref decides who is "interfering with play" (NCFC) - Farkeball, Sep 11, 19:36:30
- I've been scratching my head, too. (n/m) (NCFC) - AstroCanary, Sep 11, 18:40:54
- Its very simple (NCFC) - matgore, Sep 11, 18:44:19
- Truth is (NCFC) - Nelsons final flanel, Sep 11, 19:42:52
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.