It's obviously not much fun to see your team beaten 5-0 on Saturday
but then to learn on Monday that the U-18's lost 10-0 to Aston Villa added to which the U-23's hardly ever seen to win and I find myself wondering if it is the basic system we seem to play at all levels that is not fit for purpose?
Posted By: Highlander on August 23rd 2021 at 11:03:42
Message Thread
- It's obviously not much fun to see your team beaten 5-0 on Saturday (NCFC) - Highlander, Aug 23, 11:03:42
- FFS we lose to Sportswash City on Sat and at home to (NCFC) - Chopper, Aug 23, 12:09:27
- Just get Big Sam in ffs. (NCFC) - Under soil heating, Aug 23, 13:51:39
- An absolute tremendous post and wholeheartedly agree with almost all of it but (NCFC) - BINMEN8R, Aug 23, 13:48:14
- I think it's reasonable to question the system (NCFC) - SimonOTBC, Aug 23, 12:38:38
- They beat us 5 nil, of course it was easy for them (NCFC) - Trent_Canary, Aug 23, 13:31:08
- We played quite well against Forest when they beat us 6-2 (NCFC) - jamesward, Aug 23, 13:36:03
- That’s why I said “such” 🙄🤦♂️ (n/m) (NCFC) - SimonOTBC, Aug 23, 13:34:25
- They beat us 5 nil, of course it was easy for them (NCFC) - Trent_Canary, Aug 23, 13:31:08
- 👌 (n/m) (NCFC) - paulg, Aug 23, 12:33:23
- The u23s side is hindered because we loan the best youth out (n/m) (NCFC) - seminated_woolly, Aug 23, 11:15:36
- Yep, more about developing players than winning the league (n/m) (NCFC) - jamesward, Aug 23, 12:39:13
- Why is everybody obsessed with the system? (NCFC) - Legacy Fan, Aug 23, 11:07:26
- Think it is if you've got shit hot wide players (NCFC) - jamesward, Aug 23, 11:09:33
- The quality of players that those teams have to operate that formation is the issue (n/m) (NCFC) - trafford_canary, Aug 23, 11:09:18
- So which system will be successful for us without a Skipp-level DM? (NCFC) - Legacy Fan, Aug 23, 11:16:51
- One that uses 3 at the back or one that doesn't rely on full backs to progress the ball (n/m) (NCFC) - trafford_canary, Aug 23, 11:29:35
- ^This^ (n/m) (NCFC) - BINMEN8R, Aug 23, 13:51:14
- So are we saying 3 at the back or FOUR FOUR FUCKING TWO? (n/m) (NCFC) - Legacy Fan, Aug 23, 11:32:16
- It's probably more about players doing their jobs properly tbh (NCFC) - jamesward, Aug 23, 11:37:20
- Precisely. (NCFC) - Legacy Fan, Aug 23, 11:45:37
- Yes, agreed (n/m) (NCFC) - paulg, Aug 23, 12:34:59
- Should he? The way Rupp gets singled out by our fans is odd (NCFC) - trafford_canary, Aug 23, 11:47:43
- I agree but am assuming Farke’s criticism of him was warranted on Saturday. (n/m) (NCFC) - Legacy Fan, Aug 23, 12:23:40
- You didn't see the game? (n/m) (NCFC) - jamesward, Aug 23, 13:13:01
- I agree but am assuming Farke’s criticism of him was warranted on Saturday. (n/m) (NCFC) - Legacy Fan, Aug 23, 12:23:40
- And if they are doing that then how to we progress the ball with Gilmour? (NCFC) - trafford_canary, Aug 23, 11:45:33
- Quite often Rashica was back trying to help out (NCFC) - trafford_canary, Aug 23, 11:42:18
- Precisely. (NCFC) - Legacy Fan, Aug 23, 11:45:37
- Maybe. We used our full backs to progress the ball (NCFC) - trafford_canary, Aug 23, 11:35:58
- It's probably more about players doing their jobs properly tbh (NCFC) - jamesward, Aug 23, 11:37:20
- One that uses 3 at the back or one that doesn't rely on full backs to progress the ball (n/m) (NCFC) - trafford_canary, Aug 23, 11:29:35
- So which system will be successful for us without a Skipp-level DM? (NCFC) - Legacy Fan, Aug 23, 11:16:51
- FFS we lose to Sportswash City on Sat and at home to (NCFC) - Chopper, Aug 23, 12:09:27
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.