From the dafabet statement it looks extremely amicable.
Which suggests they may have been happy with the cancellation?
Maybe both sides had an option to withdraw after a certain time frame.
Posted By: usacanary on June 7th 2021 at 22:00:32
Message Thread
- Dafabet was c. £5m per year, this deal is slightly less (c/o The Athletic) (NCFC) - NxNW, Jun 7, 21:53:47
- Then why would we cancel the Dafabet deal and go for less money (n/m) (NCFC) - Farkeball, Jun 7, 21:56:40
- Free sausages + HT entertainment (n/m) (NCFC) - paulg, Jun 7, 22:16:11
- Length of deal? (NCFC) - CWC, Jun 7, 22:01:32
- to downtread on women obvs (n/m) (NCFC) - Tombs, Jun 7, 22:01:03
- From the dafabet statement it looks extremely amicable. (NCFC) - usacanary, Jun 7, 22:00:32
- We'd have owed them money from last season (NCFC) - CWC, Jun 7, 22:06:38
- Yep. Maybe they didn't get the ROI they were looking for. (NCFC) - usacanary, Jun 7, 22:09:58
- We'd have owed them money from last season (NCFC) - CWC, Jun 7, 22:06:38
- I did wonder that, this from The Athletic though: (NCFC) - NxNW, Jun 7, 22:00:11
- Yea makes no sense (n/m) (NCFC) - loz, Jun 7, 21:59:47
- Then why would we cancel the Dafabet deal and go for less money (n/m) (NCFC) - Farkeball, Jun 7, 21:56:40
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.