I did wonder that, this from The Athletic though:
"Dafabet’s arrival in the summer of 2019 was labelled a club-record deal, worth in excess of £5 million a year. The BK8 deal comes slightly under that mark but is still seen as a very good financial package due to the current economic climate and continuing coronavirus pandemic."
Presumably there was some break clause or something similar in the Dafabet contract which reduced its value.
Posted By: NxNW on June 7th 2021 at 22:00:11
Message Thread
- Dafabet was c. £5m per year, this deal is slightly less (c/o The Athletic) (NCFC) - NxNW, Jun 7, 21:53:47
- Then why would we cancel the Dafabet deal and go for less money (n/m) (NCFC) - Farkeball, Jun 7, 21:56:40
- Free sausages + HT entertainment (n/m) (NCFC) - paulg, Jun 7, 22:16:11
- Length of deal? (NCFC) - CWC, Jun 7, 22:01:32
- to downtread on women obvs (n/m) (NCFC) - Tombs, Jun 7, 22:01:03
- From the dafabet statement it looks extremely amicable. (NCFC) - usacanary, Jun 7, 22:00:32
- We'd have owed them money from last season (NCFC) - CWC, Jun 7, 22:06:38
- Yep. Maybe they didn't get the ROI they were looking for. (NCFC) - usacanary, Jun 7, 22:09:58
- We'd have owed them money from last season (NCFC) - CWC, Jun 7, 22:06:38
- I did wonder that, this from The Athletic though: (NCFC) - NxNW, Jun 7, 22:00:11
- Yea makes no sense (n/m) (NCFC) - loz, Jun 7, 21:59:47
- Then why would we cancel the Dafabet deal and go for less money (n/m) (NCFC) - Farkeball, Jun 7, 21:56:40
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.