No signing the next Pukki after Brexit
I suppose that's what the 52% voted for.
User Posted Link
Posted By: jampersands on December 28th 2020 at 14:41:39
Message Thread
- No signing the next Pukki after Brexit (NCFC) - jampersands, Dec 28, 14:41:39
- Pukki also played in the SPL so would he have got some points for that? (n/m) (NCFC) - Larry Hagman, Dec 28, 16:01:23
- do you reckon (NCFC) - ghostof barry butler, Dec 28, 16:17:30
- Except Pukki would clearly qualify for a WP under the new rules (NCFC) - Timmy_Goat, Dec 28, 15:43:51
- and no Brellier (NCFC) - Henclrikus, Dec 28, 15:32:19
- Drmic qualified, Fahrmann would have done too (NCFC) - jamesward, Dec 28, 15:42:20
- I suspect (NCFC) - Jester, Dec 28, 15:05:24
- Giving young British lads more of a chance is no bad thing (NCFC) - JoeyDeacon, Dec 28, 14:48:19
- agree it may well benefit the national team (NCFC) - Tombs, Dec 28, 14:55:47
- So we shouldn't have Pukki? (n/m) (NCFC) - jampersands, Dec 28, 14:50:11
- Stop being a prick it’s Christmas 🙂 (n/m) (NCFC) - JoeyDeacon, Dec 28, 14:52:14
- Er, ok (NCFC) - jampersands, Dec 28, 14:55:07
- That was a bit harsh so apologies 🙂 (n/m) (NCFC) - JoeyDeacon, Dec 28, 14:57:31
- Er, ok (NCFC) - jampersands, Dec 28, 14:55:07
- Stop being a prick it’s Christmas 🙂 (n/m) (NCFC) - JoeyDeacon, Dec 28, 14:52:14
- Pukki also played in the SPL so would he have got some points for that? (n/m) (NCFC) - Larry Hagman, Dec 28, 16:01:23
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.