I felt

...it was pretty good in the world cup but the way it has been applied since isn't great.

I think cricket has a good system, basically making a decision on the field, allowing appeals but limiting them and tight calls stay with the on field decision.

But some people in cricket don't like the fact that the same dismissal can be in and out depending on what on field decision was made.

On balance it works tho.

If we use Pukki vs Spurs as an example, it was onside in play. It would stand unless Spurs appeal. It would then be close enough to revert to on field decision and Spurs keep their appeal.

Allow one lost appeal per half per team.

I don't really see how the game is improved by having a pk retaken for the keeper being 4mm off his line tho...

Posted By: Jester on December 11th 2020 at 21:08:06

Message Thread

I really do not miss VAR in the slightest. (NCFC) - stanleh, Dec 11, 20:13:49
- I felt (NCFC) - Jester, Dec 11, 21:08:06
- Would be lovely if they would just do the decent thing and bin it. (n/m) (NCFC) - Curnster, Dec 11, 20:48:44
- It sucks the joy of scoring a goal out of you (n/m) (NCFC) - Jumbo1, Dec 11, 20:24:32
  - The illegal ones defo (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Dec 11, 20:43:12
    - they are all legal though? backed by the laws of the game as applied by the refs? (NCFC) - Tombs, Dec 11, 20:57:02
      - The illegal goals you celebrate aren’t (NCFC) - SCC 28, Dec 11, 21:01:57
        
        well, that's just your opinion based on some random stuff (NCFC) - Tombs, Dec 11, 21:04:56
  - feared for the west ham goalie there after the first pen (NCFC) - Tombs, Dec 11, 20:31:03
- totally agree with you. its gash. (n/m) (NCFC) - shoddy, Dec 11, 20:17:58

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.