Are they not allowed? i thought that any incident relating to a possible goal can be

checked? They seem to be saying that they don't bother checking incidents that should be picked up by Hawkeye as they regard it as reliable.

The keeper fell into the side netting for gods sake.

Posted By: Jim on June 18th 2020 at 11:09:26

Message Thread

VAR and hawkeye (NCFC) - Kar1, Jun 18, 10:52:39
- Do VAR and Hawkeye use different cameras? (NCFC) - The Gaffer, Jun 18, 11:01:55
- all of that is all very well but why didn't villa let sheff utd score (NCFC) - Chris Peacock, Jun 18, 10:58:19
  - Exactly (n/m) (NCFC) - essexcanaryOTBC, Jun 18, 12:21:54
  - Because (NCFC) - Winged Eel Creosote, Jun 18, 11:37:57
  - This is it (NCFC) - Under soil heating, Jun 18, 11:04:19
    - the useless twats at VAR aren't allowed to do that (NCFC) - Charles21, Jun 18, 11:06:03
      - Are they not allowed? i thought that any incident relating to a possible goal can be (NCFC) - Jim, Jun 18, 11:09:26
        
        Keepers off line aren’t checked tbf (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jun 18, 11:20:36
        
        I don’t understand why, when the notification came through late at half time (NCFC) - tim berry, Jun 18, 11:33:44
        
        Same reason Lampard’s goal v Germany wasn’t allowed at HT (n/m) (NCFC) - jamesward, Jun 18, 11:36:13
        
        Yes but since var was introduced, decisions can be made retrospectively. (NCFC) - tim berry, Jun 18, 11:46:35
        
        I guess they could take the play back to that point (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jun 18, 12:08:31

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.