I can't believe people are still having this debate

We didn't spend £1.5m. We spent many millions more than that on retaining the players who had formed in many people's opinions our best team for decades.

Spending more "to stay ahead of our plan" sounds dangerously like the reckless approach that nearly bankrupted us - and which with Naismith etc DIDN'T WORK THEN EITHER.

Once again, transfer spending does not equal success. Fulham etc etc etc etc.

We are debt-free and, having been mere moments from going out of business and LITERALLY NOT HAVING A CLUB TO SUPPORT, we are in the trustworthy sensible hands of people who have our long-term stability and success as their top priority. With that comes more a sustainable way in which to look up the table, not worry about falling down it.

"We have been let down by some at the club." Entitlement on a grand scale. They recruited Webber and Farke for a start. The club has been let down by people who moan endlessly and wish that night was day rather than backing the club we actually have and supporting the team that's actually on the pitch, not some fantasy one that doesn't exist.

Posted By: Yarf on December 28th 2019 at 09:22:10

Message Thread

Today and this season. (NCFC) - jackamo, Dec 28, 08:46:53
- Seen it here many times (NCFC) - grays, Dec 28, 11:44:35
- The plan's codename is "relegation groundhog". (n/m) (NCFC) - 1902, Dec 28, 11:11:41
- Yes, we are ahead of the Club plan overall (NCFC) - Highlander, Dec 28, 09:47:41
  - This 'plan 'mentality would have worked years ago. (NCFC) - MORDENCANARY, Dec 28, 10:58:34
    - But the whole point of the current 'plan' is that players *will* be sold. (n/m) (NCFC) - norway, Dec 28, 11:01:03
      - But it will not happen in a controlled way. (NCFC) - MORDENCANARY, Dec 28, 11:03:53
        
        We have never sold tons of players after relegation. (NCFC) - norway, Dec 28, 11:07:07
        
        But they are our best players and we know unless we incredibly lucky (NCFC) - Men without hats, Dec 28, 15:14:23
        
        A bit more... (NCFC) - Cardiff Canary, Dec 28, 16:16:34
        
        Fuck off. (n/m) (NCFC) - norway, Dec 28, 15:55:14
- I can't believe people are still having this debate (NCFC) - Yarf, Dec 28, 09:22:10
  - A few points. (NCFC) - SeattleSounders, Dec 28, 15:45:06
  - Agree Yarf (n/m) (NCFC) - revsimon, Dec 28, 11:03:56
  - if the people in charge of the club are so sensible and bring stability (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, Dec 28, 10:48:42
  - Agree with most of that but no chance the club would have ever folded. (NCFC) - lurd, Dec 28, 09:34:14
    - VMT (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Dec 28, 11:29:56
    - 'no chance'? (NCFC) - Cardiff Canary, Dec 28, 10:34:46
      - I think he means (NCFC) - duke of york, Dec 28, 10:38:30
        
        I reckon it'll happen to someone this decade (NCFC) - Cardiff Canary, Dec 28, 10:48:52
        
        A recent study showed, based on income, that the average Championship player salary should (NCFC) - norway, Dec 28, 10:53:47
        
        Assume those clubs are propped up by owners’ cash (NCFC) - duke of york, Dec 28, 11:04:45
        
        You'd think. (n/m) (NCFC) - norway, Dec 28, 11:15:59
        
        Yes. (NCFC) - lurd, Dec 28, 10:45:16
        
        Administration (NCFC) - Cardiff Canary, Dec 28, 10:53:28
    - We may not have folded but we would have gone into administration. (NCFC) - emmaroyds, Dec 28, 09:46:21
- Top 26 club (NCFC) - letsbehavinyou, Dec 28, 09:07:23
  - You need convincing to spend? (n/m) (NCFC) - Wilts, Dec 28, 09:54:38

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.