Yeah Lambert isn’t comparable with us - amazing job
But we all thought he’d go on to be a top manager and he’s currently in league one
Posted By: SCC 28 on October 28th 2019 at 09:46:09
Message Thread
- All those pre-season predictions by TV pundits and journalists, (NCFC) - thirsty work, Oct 28, 05:09:33
- We are going down (n/m) (NCFC) - firjam, Oct 28, 09:37:06
- Yep was thinking that (NCFC) - SCC 28, Oct 28, 06:31:50
- Lambert... (NCFC) - Alan, Oct 28, 09:26:08
- I do sort of believe in Farke but the nagging doubt I have with him (NCFC) - Jim, Oct 28, 10:50:45
- He DID sort it out in his first season with the 3 CB formation (NCFC) - mr carra, Oct 28, 11:02:08
- having a new midfield player playing at centre back is kind of making that tricky (n/m) (NCFC) - Charles21, Oct 28, 10:59:00
- I agree but ultimately one player (or two I suppose) should not make such a huge (NCFC) - Jim, Oct 28, 11:01:37
- Not sure you can prepare for 3 CBs being long term injured (NCFC) - mr carra, Oct 28, 11:03:41
- Also, until last week, we've had most of the midfield injured too (NCFC) - duke of york, Oct 28, 11:13:57
- Not sure you can prepare for 3 CBs being long term injured (NCFC) - mr carra, Oct 28, 11:03:41
- I agree but ultimately one player (or two I suppose) should not make such a huge (NCFC) - Jim, Oct 28, 11:01:37
- Yeah Lambert isn’t comparable with us - amazing job (NCFC) - SCC 28, Oct 28, 09:46:09
- Not sure he’s had the rub of the green since he left... (NCFC) - Alan, Oct 28, 09:59:06
- Or maybe he just had all of the rub of the green here? (NCFC) - mr carra, Oct 28, 10:12:02
- His recruitment was decent... without spending fortunes (NCFC) - Alan, Oct 28, 10:39:05
- Mike Walker (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Oct 28, 10:14:46
- Yep. Hey, even Owen Coyle was hot property for a while! (n/m) (NCFC) - mr carra, Oct 28, 10:16:48
- Or maybe he just had all of the rub of the green here? (NCFC) - mr carra, Oct 28, 10:12:02
- Not sure he’s had the rub of the green since he left... (NCFC) - Alan, Oct 28, 09:59:06
- Prem was a lot weaker back then... (NCFC) - mr carra, Oct 28, 09:33:42
- the gulf... (NCFC) - Alan, Oct 28, 09:52:48
- Brighton and Bournemouth spent fortunes iirc (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Oct 28, 09:53:56
- Indeed, and Burnley took kind of the Pulis lowest-common-denominator approach (NCFC) - mr carra, Oct 28, 10:03:19
- It’s just frustration... (NCFC) - Alan, Oct 28, 10:23:35
- Indeed, and Burnley took kind of the Pulis lowest-common-denominator approach (NCFC) - mr carra, Oct 28, 10:03:19
- Brighton and Bournemouth spent fortunes iirc (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Oct 28, 09:53:56
- Lambert at Norwich vs neil at Norwich is a no contest though (n/m) (NCFC) - earlydoors, Oct 28, 09:47:33
- Agree totally, but they're pretty small sample sizes (NCFC) - mr carra, Oct 28, 09:53:34
- I don’t agree with that at all... (NCFC) - Alan, Oct 28, 10:06:24
- Didn't immediately give Hughton £30m (NCFC) - mr carra, Oct 28, 10:08:27
- yeah you’re right I stand corrected. (n/m) (NCFC) - Alan, Oct 28, 10:15:05
- Yes was a year later first season... (NCFC) - loz, Oct 28, 10:09:08
- Did he sign redmond that first year? (n/m) (NCFC) - Alan, Oct 28, 10:16:23
- Yes. Though he only cost a couple of million, didn't he? (n/m) (NCFC) - mr carra, Oct 28, 10:20:12
- He was signed a year later same time as fer and Rvw (n/m) (NCFC) - loz, Oct 28, 10:32:12
- Oh, yes. We did also sign Whittaker & Tettey in Hughton's first season I think. (n/m) (NCFC) - mr carra, Oct 28, 10:40:38
- And Snoddy (n/m) (NCFC) - lurd, Oct 28, 10:41:36
- Obligatory Leeds purchase (n/m) (NCFC) - mr carra, Oct 28, 10:45:56
- And Michael Turner (n/m) (NCFC) - lurd, Oct 28, 10:42:31
- And Snoddy (n/m) (NCFC) - lurd, Oct 28, 10:41:36
- Oh, yes. We did also sign Whittaker & Tettey in Hughton's first season I think. (n/m) (NCFC) - mr carra, Oct 28, 10:40:38
- He was signed a year later same time as fer and Rvw (n/m) (NCFC) - loz, Oct 28, 10:32:12
- Yes. Though he only cost a couple of million, didn't he? (n/m) (NCFC) - mr carra, Oct 28, 10:20:12
- Did he sign redmond that first year? (n/m) (NCFC) - Alan, Oct 28, 10:16:23
- Didn't immediately give Hughton £30m (NCFC) - mr carra, Oct 28, 10:08:27
- I don’t agree with that at all... (NCFC) - Alan, Oct 28, 10:06:24
- Agree totally, but they're pretty small sample sizes (NCFC) - mr carra, Oct 28, 09:53:34
- the gulf... (NCFC) - Alan, Oct 28, 09:52:48
- Aarons would be perfect as a wing back (NCFC) - duke of york, Oct 28, 09:30:59
- Using WBs generally requires 3 CBs, so I see a snag... (n/m) (NCFC) - mr carra, Oct 28, 09:46:45
- Indeed (NCFC) - duke of york, Oct 28, 09:48:39
- That is probably the answer... (NCFC) - Alan, Oct 28, 09:43:40
- Aarons often seems very very isolated on the right side (NCFC) - mr carra, Oct 28, 09:40:47
- Using WBs generally requires 3 CBs, so I see a snag... (n/m) (NCFC) - mr carra, Oct 28, 09:46:45
- I do sort of believe in Farke but the nagging doubt I have with him (NCFC) - Jim, Oct 28, 10:50:45
- Norwich won the league but..... (NCFC) - MORDENCANARY, Oct 28, 08:49:31
- Good though, wasn’t it? 😊 (n/m) (NCFC) - SimonOTBC, Oct 28, 11:25:54
- Indeed. (n/m) (NCFC) - MORDENCANARY, Oct 28, 14:31:37
- Yes we didn’t smash many teams (NCFC) - SCC 28, Oct 28, 09:43:25
- Neither did Sheffield United (NCFC) - duke of york, Oct 28, 09:45:54
- We’re still attacking loads (NCFC) - SCC 28, Oct 28, 09:52:59
- Neither did Sheffield United (NCFC) - duke of york, Oct 28, 09:45:54
- Exactly. Never sustainable at this level because players at this level (NCFC) - Jim, Oct 28, 09:14:40
- We're not good enough to dominate possession against (NCFC) - duke of york, Oct 28, 09:20:57
- Yeah, we seemed to win most games by the odd goal (NCFC) - mr carra, Oct 28, 09:03:10
- Good though, wasn’t it? 😊 (n/m) (NCFC) - SimonOTBC, Oct 28, 11:25:54
- Lambert... (NCFC) - Alan, Oct 28, 09:26:08
- the thing thats riles me the most (NCFC) - earthleakage, Oct 28, 05:22:22
- That was in 2005. (NCFC) - mr carra, Oct 28, 07:38:44
- Yes but we've never before had so many "saleable assets" in the event of relegation (n/m) (NCFC) - Jim, Oct 28, 08:41:29
- if we've been relegated, how saleable are most of them actually going to be though? (n/m) (NCFC) - CWC, Oct 28, 10:23:04
- They'll still be saleable, but for less money. (n/m) (NCFC) - mr carra, Oct 28, 10:46:29
- Tend to agree, though you're still basing that on income that isn't guaranteed (NCFC) - mr carra, Oct 28, 09:08:08
- Yes, it would be a small risk. Not advocating "doing a Fulham" at least (NCFC) - Jim, Oct 28, 09:11:28
- if we've been relegated, how saleable are most of them actually going to be though? (n/m) (NCFC) - CWC, Oct 28, 10:23:04
- Yes but we've never before had so many "saleable assets" in the event of relegation (n/m) (NCFC) - Jim, Oct 28, 08:41:29
- That was in 2005. (NCFC) - mr carra, Oct 28, 07:38:44
- apart from the local ones who all said we would stay up (n/m) (NCFC) - pab, Oct 28, 05:19:25
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.