Because king tried to cheat to win a penalty

No attempt to score, just backed into the defender and goes down

Posted By: SCC 28 on September 20th 2019 at 21:34:23

Message Thread

That is a pen. How can VAR look at that and says it’s not. They need to (Other Football) - Jim, Sep 20, 21:18:33
- Because king tried to cheat to win a penalty (Other Football) - SCC 28, Sep 20, 21:34:23
- Is it 'clearly & obviously' a pen though? (Other Football) - NorthByNorthWalsham, Sep 20, 21:25:44
  - Yes. Can’t get clearer and I bet if the ref on the pitch was asked (Other Football) - Jim, Sep 20, 21:26:41
    - Of course you can get clearer ffs (Other Football) - SCC 28, Sep 20, 21:35:26
    - Just cos there was contact it doesn't mean it's a pen. (Other Football) - NorthByNorthWalsham, Sep 20, 21:29:58
      - But that’s the point. Our “refs” have decided that the ref hundreds of miles away now does (Other Football) - Jim, Sep 20, 21:32:41
        
        Only if the onfield ref has clearly made the wrong decision though (Other Football) - NorthByNorthWalsham, Sep 20, 21:36:44
        
        Yes this system is much better (Other Football) - CWC, Sep 20, 21:47:12
        
        Watch it again at full time ffs (Other Football) - SCC 28, Sep 20, 21:36:41
        
        I completely disagree. I don’t know how you can claim that with a straight face (n/m) (Other Football) - Jim, Sep 20, 21:38:26
        
        Because I’ve watched it a few times (Other Football) - SCC 28, Sep 20, 21:47:39
        
        It really wasn’t (n/m) (Other Football) - Jim, Sep 20, 21:50:25
- Because they are obviously not prepared to overrule the on pitch ref (n/m) (Other Football) - Jim, Sep 20, 21:19:20

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.