Yes. Can’t get clearer and I bet if the ref on the pitch was asked

To look at it again (as they are supposed to do) and decide if he wants to change his mind then he would have done.

Posted By: Jim on September 20th 2019 at 21:26:41

Message Thread

That is a pen. How can VAR look at that and says it’s not. They need to (Other Football) - Jim, Sep 20, 21:18:33
- Because king tried to cheat to win a penalty (Other Football) - SCC 28, Sep 20, 21:34:23
- Is it 'clearly & obviously' a pen though? (Other Football) - NorthByNorthWalsham, Sep 20, 21:25:44
  - Yes. Can’t get clearer and I bet if the ref on the pitch was asked (Other Football) - Jim, Sep 20, 21:26:41
    - Of course you can get clearer ffs (Other Football) - SCC 28, Sep 20, 21:35:26
    - Just cos there was contact it doesn't mean it's a pen. (Other Football) - NorthByNorthWalsham, Sep 20, 21:29:58
      - But that’s the point. Our “refs” have decided that the ref hundreds of miles away now does (Other Football) - Jim, Sep 20, 21:32:41
        
        Only if the onfield ref has clearly made the wrong decision though (Other Football) - NorthByNorthWalsham, Sep 20, 21:36:44
        
        Yes this system is much better (Other Football) - CWC, Sep 20, 21:47:12
        
        Watch it again at full time ffs (Other Football) - SCC 28, Sep 20, 21:36:41
        
        I completely disagree. I don’t know how you can claim that with a straight face (n/m) (Other Football) - Jim, Sep 20, 21:38:26
        
        Because I’ve watched it a few times (Other Football) - SCC 28, Sep 20, 21:47:39
        
        It really wasn’t (n/m) (Other Football) - Jim, Sep 20, 21:50:25
- Because they are obviously not prepared to overrule the on pitch ref (n/m) (Other Football) - Jim, Sep 20, 21:19:20

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.